People v McMaster

Annotate this Case
People v Mcmaster 2013 NY Slip Op 08154 Decided on December 5, 2013 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: December 5, 2013
105281

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

v

KENNETH McMASTER, Appellant.

Calendar Date: October 22, 2013
Before: Stein, J.P., McCarthy, Spain and Egan Jr., JJ.


John J. Goodman Jr., Greenwich, for appellant, and
appellant pro se.
Kevin C. Kortright, District Attorney, Fort Edward
(Nicole C. Fish, Law Intern), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (McKeighan, J.), rendered June 22, 2012, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree and, under the terms of the plea agreement, was sentenced as a second felony offender to 1½ to 3 years in prison, that sentence to run consecutively with the sentence he was then serving. He now appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record, which reflects that defendant received the minimum permissible sentence, as well as counsel's brief and defendant's letter submission, we agree. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Stein, J.P., McCarthy, Spain and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.