Matter of Reidy

Annotate this Case
Matter of Reidy 2010 NY Slip Op 07663 [77 AD3d 1276] October 28, 2010 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, December 15, 2010

In the Matter of Patrick M. Reidy, an Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner.

—[*1] Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Michael Philip Jr. of counsel), for petitioner.

Greenberg Traurig, L.L.P., Albany (Michael L. Koenig of counsel), for respondent.

Per Curiam. Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1992. He maintained an office for the practice of law in the City of Saratoga Springs, Saratoga County.

On August 27, 2010, respondent was convicted in Saratoga County Court upon his plea of guilty of the crime of grand larceny in the second degree, a class C felony (see Penal Law § 155.40 [1]). Petitioner moves pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a) and (b) to strike respondent's name from the roll of attorneys. Respondent does not oppose the motion.

Respondent was automatically disbarred and ceased to be an attorney when he entered his guilty plea to a felony (see Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [a]; Matter of Hutson, 72 AD3d 1328 [2010]). Therefore, we grant petitioner's motion and strike respondent's name from the roll of attorneys. [*2]

Spain, J.P., Rose, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Ordered that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent's name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York; and it is further ordered that respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and respondent is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further ordered that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court's rules regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 806.9).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.