Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a.

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law \s 468-a 2010 NY Slip Op 06347 [76 AD3d 744] August 5, 2010 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, September 29, 2010

In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, Respondents. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner.

—[*1] Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner.

Per Curiam. Petitioner moves to suspend respondent attorneys on the ground that they have failed to file a registration statement and pay the required attorney registration fee in accordance with Judiciary Law § 468-a (2) and part 118 of the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR 118.1 [c]).

The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. They have also failed to respond to the instant motion.

Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration "shall constitute conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice and shall be referred to the appropriate appellate division . . . for disciplinary action." This Court has previously held that failure to comply with the registration requirements is professional misconduct warranting discipline (see e.g. Matter of Arms, 251 AD2d 743 [1998]; Matter of Ryan, 238 AD2d 713 [1997]; Matter of Farley, 205 AD2d 874 [1994]).

In view of respondents' continued failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of the Judiciary Law and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts, petitioner's motion is granted and the respondents listed on the schedule attached hereto are [*2]suspended, effective 30 days from the date of this order, until further order of this Court (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 65 AD3d 1447 [2009]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further ordered that the respondents listed on the schedule attached hereto are suspended, effective 30 days from the date of this order, until further order of this Court; and it is further ordered that, for the period of suspension, respondents are commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and respondents are hereby forbidden to appear as attorneys or counselors-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority or to give to another any opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further ordered that respondents shall comply with the provisions of this Court's rules regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 806.9).

Last Name

First Name

Middle Name

 

Reg #

Year Adm

Dept

 

 Barrantes

    Rachael

 Wendeen

 

4124343

2003

3

 

 Bradbrooke

    Timothy

 Dane

 

2709111

1995

1

 

 Brown

    Judith

 Helen

 

2598415

1994

3

 

 Junco

    Judith

 Lynn

 

2947141

1999

3

 

 Peclard

    Oliver

 Jacques

 

2170058

1987

3

 

 Uyamadu

    John

 Chukwunwe

 

4343307

2005

3