Matter of Johnny M. Rodriguez v Commissioner of Labor

Annotate this Case
Matter of Rodriguez (New York City Dept. of Educ.\MCommissioner of Labor) 2005 NY Slip Op 09383 [17 AD3d 1175] December 8, 2005 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 15, 2006

In the Matter of the Claim of Johnny M. Rodriguez, Appellant. New York City Department of Education, Respondent; Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

—[*1]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 6, 2005, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was unable to file a valid original claim pursuant to Labor Law § 527.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was unable to file a valid original claim pursuant to Labor Law § 527. The record establishes that during claimant's base period of April 1, 2003 to March 31, 2004, he was credited with earnings of $1,536.19 received during the second quarter of 2003. Although it is undisputed that claimant worked during the first quarter of 2004, January 1, 2004 to March 31, 2004, remuneration for such employment was not received until the second quarter of 2004 and, therefore, such amount was properly excluded from his base period. Claimant contends that had he received such wages in a timely fashion, they would have been attributable to the first quarter of 2004 and included in his base period. Nevertheless, Labor Law § 516 provides that " 'wages paid' or 'remuneration paid' shall, for the purposes of [the unemployment insurance law], be deemed paid on the date such payments are made." Accordingly, inasmuch as [*2]claimant did not work in at least two calendar quarters during the base period and did not receive sufficient earnings within that period, the Board's decision will not be disturbed (see Labor Law § 527; Matter of Nieblas [Commissioner of Labor], 21 AD3d 1193, 1194 [2005]; Matter of Paterson [Commissioner of Labor], 14 AD3d 751, 753 [2005]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.