People v Steven E. Heeman

Annotate this Case
People v Heeman 2005 NY Slip Op 08897 [23 AD3d 920] November 23, 2005 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 18, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Steven E. Heeman, Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered May 26, 2004, which revoked defendant's probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

In June 2002, defendant was convicted of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree and driving while intoxicated and sentenced to five years probation. Thereafter, in February 2004, defendant was charged with, and later admitted to, violating various terms of his probation, whereupon his probation was revoked and he was resentenced to concurrent prison terms of 1 to 3 years. On appeal, defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and defense counsel's brief, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel's application for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.