People v Michael Newsome

Annotate this Case
People v Newsome 2005 NY Slip Op 02899 [17 AD3d 785] April 14, 2005 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 22, 2005

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Newsome, Appellant.

—[*1]Peters, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Buckley, J.), rendered February 2, 2004, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

In satisfaction of a three-count indictment charging defendant with various drug crimes, defendant pleaded guilty in July 2002 to attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. Before he could be sentenced, however, defendant absconded and a bench warrant was issued for his arrest. Defendant was ultimately returned to County Court's jurisdiction in 2004 and sentenced, as a second felony offender and in accordance with the plea agreement, to a prison term of 3 to 6 years. Defendant appeals and we affirm.

Defendant's only contention on appeal is that he was denied his statutory right to a speedy trial (see CPL 30.30). Upon our review of the record, we find that defendant's knowing, voluntary and intelligent guilty plea operated as a waiver of his right to seek appellate review of this issue (see People v Friscia, 51 NY2d 845, 847 [1980]; People v Cintron, 7 AD3d 827, 828 [2004]; People v Attanasio, 240 AD2d 877, 877-878 [1997]). Accordingly, the judgment of conviction must be affirmed.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. [*2]Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.