Order Promulgating Amendments to the Rules of the Board on Judicial Standards

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF MINNESOTA February 24, 2016 IN SUPREME COURT Om:ciEOF API'B.IA1ECC!Ut'liiJ ADM10-8032 ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF THE BOARD ON JUDICIAL STANDARDS The Minnesota Board on Judicial Standards filed a petition recommending amendments to the Rules of the Board on Judicial Standards. On October 28, 2015, the court opened a public comment period. Written comments were submitted by the Minnesota District Judges Association and a private practitioner. The court has considered the proposed amendments and the written comments. Based on all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Rules of the Board on Judicial Standards are amended as shown in the attachment to this order. The Rules as amended are prescribed and promulgated to be effective July 1, 2016. The Board shall make the Rules of the Board on Judicial Standards, as amended, publicly accessible on the Board's website. Dated: February 24, 2016 BY THE COURT: L~~ Chief Justice AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF THE BOARD ON JUDICIAL STANDARDS In the following amendments, deletions are indicated by a line drawn through the words and additions by a line drawn under the words. Rules of Board on Judicial Standards Table of Contents *** 7. [Deleted]Admonition Review Hearing DEFINITIONS "Board" means the Minnesota Board on Judicial Standards. *** "Complaint" is any eommHBieation, oral or ·.witten, made by judges, lllVt'yers, eourt personnel or any member of the general publie regarding the eonduet ofajudgeinformation in any form from any source received by the board that alleges or from which a reasonable inference can be drawn that a judge committed misconduct or has a disability. "Deferred Disposition Agreement" is an agreement between the judge and the board or hearing panel for the judge to undergo treatment, participate in education programs, or take other corrective action, based upon misconduct or disability that can be addressed through treatment or a rehabilitation program. *** "Evaluation" is a prompt~ and-discreet, and limited inquiry by the executive secretary into the facts and circumstances of any complaint or information that alleges conduct listed in Rule 4(a). *** "Investigation" is a full inquiry by the e~£eeutive seeretary, with the authorization of the board, into the facts and circumstances of any complaint or information that alleges conduct listed in Rule 4(a). "Judge" is any judge, including ~full-time, part-time, or senior and retired judges, judicial officer, referee, magistrate, or other hearing officer employed in the judicial branch of the state of Minnesota, any judge of the Minnesota Tax Court.1 ep-any judge of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals. and the Chief Administrative Law Judge. *** "Senior Judge" is a "Retired Judge Subject to Recall" within the meaning of Part II, Application. Minnesota Code of Judicial Conduct. (Amended effective January 1, 1996; amended effective July 1, 2009; amended effective July 1, 2016.) Rule 1. Organization of Board Appointment of Members. The Board on Judicial Standards shall consist of one judge of the Court of Appeals, three judges of district court, two lawyers who have practiced law in the state for at least ten years and four resident citizens of Minnesota who are not judges, retired judges or lawyers. The exeeutiYe seeretary, who shall be an attomey lieeased to preetiee lav1 ia Minnesota, with a m.iaim.UH'I: of fifteea yetlfs' eKperieaee ia the preetiee of law, iaeludiag any seFViee as a judge, shall be appoiated by the botlfd. All members shall be appointed by the governor with the advice and consent of the senate except that senate confirmation shall not be required for judicial members. w ill Term of Office. (1) The term of each member shall be four years with the term ending on the first Monday in January except as provided in Rule l(b)(2(i). (2) No member shall serve more than two full four-year terms or their equivaleat, not to exceed eight years except as follows: (i) members may continue to serve until their successors are appointed and qualified but in no case later than July 1 in a year in which a term expires unless reappointed; (ii) if a member is appointed to fill an unexpired term that does not exceed two years, the member is eligible for appointment to two additional four-year terms. !£l Vacancy. ( 1) A vacancy on the board shall be deemed to occur: (i) When a member retires from the board; or (ii) When a judge who is a member of the board ceases to hold the judicial office held at the time of selection; or (iii) When a lawyer who is a member of the board ceases to be in good standing 2 to practice law in the courts of this state or is appointed or elected to a judicial office; or (iv) When a !eypublic member becomes a lawyer; or (v) When a member is no longer a resident citizen of Minnesota. (2) Vacancies shall be filled by selection of a successor in the same manner as required for the selection of the predecessor in office. A member selected to fill a vacancy shall hold office for the unexpired term of the predecessor. All vacancies on the board shall be filled within 90 days after the vacancy occurs. (3) Members of the board may retire therefrom by submitting their resignation to the board, which shall certify the vacancy to the governor. @ Appointment and Performance Review of Executive Secretary. The executive secretary, who shall be an attorney licensed to practice law in Minnesota, with a minimum of fifteen years' experience in the practice of law, including any service as a judge, shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the board. The board shall annually conduct a performance review of the executive secretary. 00 Duties and Responsibilities of Executive Secretary. The executive secretary shall have duties and responsibilities prescribed by the board, including the authority to: (I) Receive complaints and allegations as to misconduct or disability; (2) Make preliminary evaluations; (3) Conduct investigations of complaints as directed by the board; (4) Recommend dispositions; (5) Maintain the board's records; (6) Maintain statistics concerning the operation of the board and make them available to the board and to the Supreme Court; (7) Prepare the board's budget for approval by the board and administer its funds; (8) Employ and supervise other members of the board's staff; (9) Prepare an annual report of the board's activities for presentation to the board, to the Supreme Court and to the public; (I O)Employ, with the approval of the board, special counsel, private investigators or other experts as necessary to investigate and process matters before the board and before the Supreme Court. The use of the attorney general's staffprosecutors or law enforcement officers for this purpose is not allowed. The use of the director and staff of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility for this purpose is allowed if the matter involves conduct of a judge, other than a Supreme Court Justice, that occurred prior to the judge assuming judicial office. IndividualsAttorneys employed or providing assistance under this section shall be deemed to be counsel to the Board on Judicial Standards for the purposes of these rules; and ( 11) Issue informal advisory opinions to judges as delegated by the board. 3 (e) Perfermanee Review ef Exeeutive Seeretary. The board shall arn:mally coaduot a perfoRB:anoe re'liew of the ~eoHti'le secretary. (f) Quorum and Chairperson. (1) A quorum for the transaction of business by the board shall be s-Hta majority of the members of the board who are not recused. (2) The board shall elect from its members a chairpersoa and vice-chairpersoa, each of whom shall serve a term of two years. The vice-chairpersoa shall act as chairpersoa in the absence of the chairpersoa. (g) Meetings of the Board. Meetings of the board shall be held at the call of the chairpersoa, the vice-chairpersoa, the executive secretary or the written request of three members ofthe board. *** (j) Cede of EdtiesBoard Policies. The board may adopt policies consistent with these Rules governing the conduct of its business and performance of its duties. The board shall maintain a Code of Ethics setting forth the ethical standards expected of board members in the performance of the board's responsibilities. {k) Executive Committee. The board's executive committee shall consist of the chair, vice-chair, and a third member elected by the board. The executive committee shall include a judge, a public member, and a lawyer. The executive committee shall act on behalf of the board between meetings within limits prescribed by the board. The executive committee shall not have the authority to determine that there is reasonable cause to believe a judge has committed misconduct. (Amended effective January 1, 1996; amended effective March 30, 1999; amended effective July 1, 2009; amended effective July I, 2016.) Ad·lisory Committee Commeat 1999 Ameadmeat RNk 1(ri) (1 ()) has heen metfi.jied te a118w the 1i9C efthe diFeeter and staf:fe.fthe Office efLmvyers Prof'essienal Respensihility te pPO'lide iw,•eatigati'IC and sttppert se,..,•iees in sit1iatiens bi'WJlv•b2g eendNet that eeeNFI"ed prier 18 a jNdge assNming jNdieietl ejfiee. Related ehtmges gra1it the Lmvyers Pn7fo98ienal Respensihility BeardjNrisdietien te eensider whether sNeh eendu:et warf'ants lawyer diseipline. R.Bd.J-ud.Std. 2; R.L.PrefResp. 6Z(a). It is eentemplated that eemplaints aheNt the eendNet e-fajNdge eee'NFI"ingprier t8 t.lrtejNdge assNmingjNdieial ejjke will he in·,restigated in the first instance hy the Offiee of LmyY'CrB Prefossienal Respensihility {R.Bd..htd.Std. 6Z(h); R.L.Pfflj+:Resp. 6Z(h)(2)}, and the reabtlts weNld he diselesed te t.lre Beard en Jwiieial Standarth. R.Bd..htd.Std. 5(a)(4); R.L.:Pt'ofResp. 20{a)(1 {)). This al-lews f{J,. efficient and cffeeti·;e NBC ofinY'estigative 4 resources by beth diseiplinetry be(J;f'(:}s. Related changes also aMtheri=e the Mse ef the hearing record, findings, and reeemmendatiens ef the lawyer disciplinary f»¥Jeess in t-he jMdieial diseipli1ttHJ>' precess. R.Bd.Jlfd.Std. 6Z(d); R.L.PrejResp. 6Z(h)(4). RMle 1(d) (1 {)) pfflhibits the J;tSC efthe staffofthe Office efLawyers Pr-e}cssienal Responsibility iYhen the pre bench eendHet at issMe bweh;es a &tpren1e GeHrt Justice beeaHse the effiee's director and stetffare appointed a11d compensated by the GeHrt. /fsMeh a ease were te arise, it is contemplated that t.Lze Office efLe:wyers Prefessienal Responsibility weHld fallow existing conflict preeedHres, which inehtde assigning a former attorney er fin·mer beard member te re.,.iew andf<Jllew Hp en patentlyfri·;elel:tS complaints and hiring eHtside eeMnsel and investigators te handl:e ether complaints. The prehibitien against the Hse ef effiee st«ffdaes net prohibit een1mHnieatie1'1 o.l confidential information between the twe beards regarding matters iw;elving the eenduet o.lajJ;tStiee eeeurringprier to assHmptien .r· d' . ~ JNrWza l 0.ffl ee. Aledifieatiens te Rule 1(ti)(l {)) also clarify that b<Jdi..tduals empleyed er pre.,.iding assistance te t-he exeeHtiW! seeretary end the heard are considered eeHnsel te t-he b98rdforpurposes ~+these rNles. This ensHres, for example, that the immunity a11d pri¥i/ege provisions Mnda RHle 3 and the confidentiality and werk P~''<Jduetprevisiens under Rule 5 apply te these individuals when hiey are B:SSisting the exeetttive seeretetry and the beard. Rule 2. Jurisdiction and Powers of Board (a) Powers of the Board. (1) Disposition of Complaints. The board shall have the power to receive complaints, investigate, conduct hearings, make certain summary dispositions, and make recommendations to the Supreme Court concerning: (i) Allegations of judicial misconduct; (ii) Allegations of physical or mental disability of judges; and (iii) Matters of voluntary retirement for disabilityt-afld (iY)Re\'iew of a judge's compliance •Nith Minnesota Statutes, section 546.27. (2) Advisory Opinions. The board, and as delegated by the board, the executive secretary, may issue advisory opinions on proper judicial conduct with respect to the provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct. An advisory opinion may be requested by a judge or a candidate for judicial office. (i) A request that the board issue for-an individual written advisory opinion shall relate to prospective conduct only, and shall be submitted in writing and contain a complete statement of all facts pertaining to the intended conduct and a clear, concise question of judicial ethics. The board shall issue a written opinion within 30 days after receipt of the written request, unless the time period is extended by the board. 5 (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) The board may issue opinions of general applicability. The executive secretary may provide informal opinions to judges. The board and the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility may disclose to each other confidential information concerning opinion requests in order to promote consistency in their opinions. The fact that the judge or judicial candidate requested and relied on an advisory opinion shall be taken into account in any subsequent disciplinary proceedings. The advisory opinion shall not be binding on the hearing panel or the Supreme Court in the exercise of their judicialdiscipline responsibilities. *** (e) Subpoena~ and Depositions During Investigation. (1) Subpoenas and Depositions Limited. Subpoenas and I:}Qepositions during the board's investigation shall not be allowed, provided that, for good cause shown, a deposition may be taken of a witness living outside the state or physically ooable to attend the hearingexcept as provided in this Rule. Subpoenas and depositions in panel proceedings are governed by Rules 7(b) and 9(b). (2) Subpoenas for Investigation. During the investigative stage of a proceeding, prior to a finding of reasonable cause to proceed, and subject to the limitations of Rule 2(e)(l): (i) Upon resolution of the board, the executive secretary may make application to the board to authorize fer-the issuance of a subpoena compelling any person, including a judge, to attend and give testimony, and to produce documents, books, accounts and other records. Such subpoena shall issue upon a sho•Ning that the information sought appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The board may authorize the subpoena upon a finding that the information sought appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of evidence of possible misconduct by a judge or the absence of such misconduct. (ii) failure or refusal of a judge viho is the subject of information to cooperate or the intentional misrepresentation of a material fact by the judge shall constitute conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice and may provide reasonable cause for the board to proceed under Rule2(e)(3). (3) Sul>peeaas fer Heariag. At all other stages ofthe proceeding following a finding of reasonable cause to proceed, and subject to the limitations of Rille 2(e)( 1), both the board and the judge being investigated shall be entitled to compel, b~' subpoena, attendance and testimony of witnesses, including the judge as a vlitness, and the inspection of documents, books, accounts, and other records. Ql_Issuing Subpoenas. The District Court of Ramsey County shall issue subpoenas upon presentation of a resolution of the board. 6 (4) Motions. Prior to the appointment of a hearing panel pursuant to R~le 8(b), tihe District Court of Ramsey County shall have jurisdiction over motions arising from Rule 2(e) requests subpoenas and depositions. Following the appointment of a panel, the presider of the panel before whom the matter is pending shall hfrlre jurisdietion o•;er motions arising from Rule 2(e) requests and shall ha-¥e all the powers of a distriet eourt judge .•Any resulting deeision or order of the presider of the panel or the Distriet Court of Ramsey County ma-y not be appealed before entry of the final order in the diseiplinary proeeeding. The judge shall be denominated by number or randomly selected initials in any District Court proceedings. Any resulting order of the District Court may not be appealed before entry of the hearing panel's disposition in accordance with Rule 11. Cooperation. A judge who is the subject of investigation or a disciplinary proceeding shall comply with the board's reasonable requests to furnish a full and complete explanation covering the matter under consideration and to appear for conferences. A judge who is the subject of disciplinary action under these rules shall comply with the terms and conditions of any order or disposition imposing discipline. (0 ,(g} Impeachment. Nothing in these rules shall affect the impeachment of judges under the Minnesota Constitution, Article 8. (Amended effective January 1, 1996; amended effective March 30, 1999; amended effective July 1, 2009; amended effective July 1, 2016.) Advisory Committee Comment 1999 Amendment RHk 2(a) has been amended te reeegni&e t-.'?:at the heard mtly make certain s'blmmary dispesitiet9:S. These dispesitiens inehtde prepesed pHhlie reprimands 'bltider R'blle 6(d)(l)(ii), ·,t~hieh 8f'C s'blhjeet te a j'bldge 's right te den9:and a jofflial hearing before the reprimand is made pHhlie, and nenp'blbtie WCH'I'lings, eenditiens, ee'blnseling, treatment, atid assistance directed by the heard 'binder RHie 6(/). RHie2(h) has been medified te permit the Lawyers Prefessienal Respensihility Beard te alse exercise j'hlrisdietien te eensider ·whether discipline as a lmvyer is warranted in matters iw;eh·ing eend'blet of any j'hldge eee'blrring prier te the ass'blmptien ofj'bldieial effiee. As set forth in the definitien seetien ofthese r'hlks, the term ']Hdge" inel'bldes any jHdge, j'bldieial ej}ieer, referee, er ether hearing effieer empleyed in the j'hldieial branch, and at~y j'bldge of the ~Uinneseta T$ Ce'blt·t er Werker's Cempensatien Celtl"/ ofAppeals. See ~~linneseta Stat'bltes, seetiens 49().15 .18; 175A. ()l, s'blbdi'lisiet9: 4; 2 71JJl (1998). The preeed'blre te he follewed in sit'blatiens in'le/?;ingpre bench eend'blet is set forth in R'hlk 6Z f>).rthese r'blles. 7 Rule 3. Immunity; Privilege Information submitted to the board or its staff and testimony given in the proceedings under these rules shall be absolutely privileged, and no civil action predicated thereon may be instituted against the complainant or witness, or their counsel. Members of the board, referees, board counsel, mentors appointed by the board, hearing panel members, a designee appointed by the Supreme Court under Rule 16(d)(4), and staff shall be absolutely immune from suit for all conduct in the course of their official duties. (Amended effective January 1, 1996; amended effective July 1, 2016.) Rule 4. Grounds for Discipline or Other Action (a) Grounds for Discipline or Other Action Shall Include: (1) Conviction of a crime punishable as a felony under state or federal law or any crime involving moral turpitude; (2) A persistent failure to perform judicial duties; (3) Pattern of incompetence in the performance of judicial duties; (4) Habitual intemperance; (5) Conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute, including, but not limited to, discrimination against or harassment of persons on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, sexual preference, disability or age; (6) Conduct that constitutes a violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct or Rules of Professi anal ConductProfessional Responsibility; (7) Disability. (b) Dispesitiea ef Crimiaal ChargesCriminal Conviction or Acguittal. A judge's criminal conviction in any American jurisdiction, even if upon a plea of nolo contendere or subject to appellate review, is, in proceedings under these Rules, conclusive evidence that the judge committed the conduct for which the judge was convicted. The same is true of a conviction in a foreign country if the facts and circumstances surrounding the conviction indicate that the judge was accorded fundamental fairness and due process. An eon·;iction, acquittal, or other disposition of any criminal charge filed against a judge shall not preclude action by the board with respect to the conduct upon which the charge was based. (c) Proceedings Not Substitute for Appeal. In the absence of fraud, corrupt motive, or bad faith, tThe board shall not take action against a judge for making findings of fact, reaching a legal conclusion, or applying the law as understood by the judge unless the judge acts contrary to clear and determined law and the error is egregious. made in bad faith, or made as part of a pattern or practice of legal error. Claims of error shall otherwise be left to the appellate process. 8 (Amended effective January 1, 1996; amended effective July 1, 2009; amended effective July 1, 2016.) Advisory Committee Comment 2009 Amendment Retaliatery heha·;ier hy the j1:1;dge related t8 a eemplaint nu:Jy he gY8l:l;1fflsfar discipline l:l;1'lder the Cede &}Judicial Ce1'ldHet er P-r&.fessie1'lal Respensihility. See, e.g., lnq1:1;iry inte the Cend1:1;et &jJiiirphy, 737 N W.2d 355, 3MJ (J.Iinn.2007). Rule 5. Confidentiality (a) Before Formal Complaint and Response. Except as otherwise provided in this rule or Rule 16(f), all proceedings shall be confidential until the Formal Complaint or Formal Statement of Disability Proceeding and response, if any, have been filed with the Supreme Court pursuant to Rule 8. The board shall establish procedures for enforcing the confidentiality provided by this rule. ( 1) If at any time the board issues a public reprimand, such action shall be a matter of public record. (2) If the board issues a private admonition or a dismissal with a letter of caution or enters into a deferred disposition agreement, this action may be disclosed to the chief justice, chief judge, and/or district administrator of the judicial district in which the judge sits. Such disclosure is at the discretion of the board and shall be for the purpose of monitoring future conduct of the judge and for assistance to the judge in modifying the judge's conduct. To the extent that any information is disclosed by the board pursuant to this provision, the chief justice, chief judge and/or district administrator shall maintain the confidentiality of the information in accordance with Rule 5. (3) Information may be disclosed between the Board on Judicial Standards or executive secretary and the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility Beafd or the direetor in furtherance of their duties to investigate and consider conduct that occurred prior to a judge assuming judicial office. *** (e) Public Statements by Board. (1) In any case in which the subject matter becomes public through independent sources or through a waiver of confidentiality by the judge, the board may issue statements as it deems appropriate in order to confirm the pendency of the investigation, to clarify the procedural aspects of the disciplinary proceedings, to explain the right of the judge to a fair hearing without prejudgment and to state that the judge denies or admits the allegations. The statement shall be first submitted to the judge involved for comments and criticisms prior to its release, but the board in its discretion may release the statement as originally prepared. (2) The board may disclose that a matter is not being investigated. If an the-inquiry 9 was initiated as a result of notoriety or because of conduct that is a matter of public record, or if a complaint filed with the board has become publicly known, information concerning the lack of cause to proceed may be released by the board. If the inquiry was initiated after the statutory filing period for judicial office has opened, the board may issue a public statement as deemed appropriate pursuant to Rule 6(e). (3) The board may make such disclosures as it deems appropriate whenever the board has determined that there is a need to notify another person or agency in order to protect the public or the administration of justice. (f) Disclosure in Event of Application to the Governor for Disability Retirement. The board may disclose to the governor information about the existence, status, and nature of pending complaints, complaints resulting in action of the board pursuant to Rule 6(f)(5), and complaints resulting in a private warning or imposition of conditions prior to August 1, 2009 regarding judges who have applied to the governor for disability retirement as provided in Rule 18~. (g) Disclosure for Judicial Selection, Appointment, Election, or Assignment. When any state or federal agency seeks material in connection with the selection or appointment of judges or the assignment of a retired judge to judicial duties, the board may release information from its files only: (1) if the judge in question agrees to such dissemination; and (2) if the file reflects a pending complaint, some action of the board pursuant to Rule 6(f)(5), or a private warning or imposition of conditions prior to August 1, 2009. If the board action was taken on or after January 1, 1996, such information may also be released if a judge is involved in a contested election, subject to the same restrictions. (h) Disclosure to Judge. The judge who is the subject of a complaint shall, upon request, have access to the file relative to the complaint at any stage of the proceedings, including witness statements and notes of witness interviews. EKcept as pro•1ided in the first sentence, The following shall not be required to be disclosed: ( 1) communications between the executive secretary and board members and/or board counsel and communications between board members in furtherance of their duties and (2) the work product of the executive secretary, board members, and board counsel, including their notes, and the records of the board's and hearing panel's deliberations shall not be required to be disclosed. (i) Waiver of Confidentiality. A respondent judge may waive confidentiality at any time during the proceedings. Senior Judges. If the board receives credible information that a senior judge has engaged in conduct in violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct, the board may notify the chief justice, a chief judge, and the state court administrator. (j) 10 (k) Mentors. If the board appoints a mentor for the judge, the board may disclose information to the mentor and may disclose information concerning the mentorship to the chief justice and a chief judge. If a mentor is appointed in connection with a judge's public discipline, the board may publicly disclose the identity of the mentor. (Amended effective January 1, 1996; amended effective March 30, 1999; amended effective July 1, 2009; amended effective July 1, 2016.) A:dYisory Committee Comment 1999 Amendment Rbtle 5(a) has been modified by the flcidition efeklbtSe (4) to permit the exehflnge ef informtltion betwee1'i the two diseiplinflry botlrds tlnd t."leir stCJjJ in sitbttltions in·;o/ving eondbtet ef 8 jbtdge thtlt oeebtrt'ed prior to the jbtdge 89Sbtl'l'li1'lg jbtdieifll off-we. See fllse R.L. Prof:Resp. 2{)(8) (l 0). Both the Bo8ffl on Judieifll Stt1ndards tlnd the Lr:myas :Pre.fessionfll Responsibility Bemw ht1ve jbtt'isdietien in sbteh eases. R.Bd.Jud.Std. 2(8); R.L.l7ef:Resp.6Z. Rule 6. Screening and Investigation (a) Initiation of Inquiry. An inquiry may be initiated as follows: (I) An inquiry relating to conduct of a judge may be initiated upon a complaint. (2) The board may on its own motion make an inquiry into the conduct or physical or mental condition of a judge. (3) Upon request of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, the board shall make an inquiry into the conduct or physical or mental condition of a judge. (4) An inquiry relating to the physical or mental condition of a judge may be initiated pursuant to Rule 16. (b) Screening. The executive secretary shall review the complaint or information received by the board. resulting in the initiation of an inquiry. If the matters alleged in the complaint or information would not constitute misconduct or disability if true,If the complaint or information does not contain a basis for a reasonable belief that a judge may have engaged in misconduct or may have a disability, the executive secretary shall dismiss the complaint or end the inquiry, subject to review and approval by a board member as assigned by the chair, or, if appropriate, refer the matter to another agency or court. If the matters alleged in the complaint or information would constitute judicial misconduct or disability if true, the executive secretary shall conduct a preliminary evaluation. (c) Evaluation. If after screening, the eJ£ecuti•fe secretary determines the complaint raises allegations as to conduct that might constitute grounds for discipline or other action, Upon a reasonable belief that a judge may have engaged in misconduct or may have a disability, the executive secretary shall conduct an prompt, discreet and confidential 11 evaluation. The results of all evaluations shall be routinely submitted to the board. (d) Investigation; Notice. (1) Upon review of the preliminary evaluation, or on its own motion, the board may, by resolution: (i) stay proceedings pending action by another agency or court; (ii) dismiss the complaint or end the inquiry; or (iii) authorize an investigation. (2) Within ten (1 0) business days after an investigation has been authorized by the board, the executive secretary shall give the following notice to the judge whose conduct is being investigated: (i) a specific statement of the allegations and possible violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct being investigated, including notice that the investigation can be expanded if appropriate; (ii) the judge's duty to respond under Rule 6(d)(5); (iii) the judge's opportunity to appear before the board or panel of the board under Rule 6( d)( 6); and (iv) the name of the complainant or informant, unless the board determines there is good cause to withhold that information. Except as provided in clause (3), the executive secretary shall not commence an formal investigation until such notice is sent to the judge. (3) The board may defer notice for specific reasons, but when notice is deferred, the executive secretary shall give notice to the judge before making a recommendation as to discipline. (4) Notice shall be sent immediately upon request of the judge whose conduct or physical or mental condition is the subject of the inquiry if the inquiry has been made public. (5) Upon request of the executive secretary, the judge shall file a written response within thirty (30) days after service of the notice under Rule 6( d)(2). (6) Before the board determines its disposition of the inquiry, either the board or the judge may request that the judge appear before the board or a panel of the board to respond to questions. The appearance shall be granted. If the board requests the judge's appearance, the executive secretary shall give the judge 20 days' notice. The board may require that the judge's and the testimony shall-be sworn. *** (f) Disposition After Investigation. ( 1) Upon conclusion of an investigation or determination by another agency or court, the executive secretary may recommend disposition to the board. (2) The board shall review the results of the investigation or determination by another agency or court and the recommendations of the executive secretary and determine whether there is reasonable cause to believe the judge committed 12 misconduct. (3) A finding of reasonable cause shall require the concurrence of a majority of the non-recused members of the .fffil-board. (4) Upon determination that there is not reasonable ·cause to believe the judge committed misconduct, the board shall dismiss the complaint or end the inquiry. Upon dismissal or termination of the inquiry, the board may issue a letter of caution that addresses the judge's conduct. (5) If the board finds there is reasonable cause to believe the judge committed misconduct, it may: (i) enter into a deferred disposition agreement for a period of time, and the agreement may specify the disposition upon completion; if the misconduct appears to be of an isolated and non-serious nature, (ii) issue a private admonition, which may include conditions; (iii) issue a public reprimand, which may include conditions; or (iv) issue a Formal Complaint. (6) Prior to issuance of a private admonition, the board shall serve the judge with a copy of the proposed private admonition and a notice stating that within ~14 days after service of the proposed private admonition, the judge may serve the board with either a written demand for a private hearing in accordance with Rule 1before the board, or the written comments and criticisms of the judge regarding the proposed admonition. If the judge makes a timely demand for a pri';ate heariHg, the board shall comply. If no timely demand for a hearing is made, the board may consider the comments and criticisms, if any, but may in its discretion releaseissue the private admonition as originally prepared. (7) Prior to issuance of a public reprimand, the board shall serve the judge with a copy of the proposed reprimand and a notice stating that within ~ 14 days of service of the proposed reprimand, the judge may serve the board with either a written demand for a formal hearing as provided in Rule 8, or the written comments and criticisms of the judge regarding the proposed reprimand. If the judge makes a timely demand for a formal hearing, the board shall comply with Rule 8. If no timely demand for a hearing is made, the board may consider the comments and criticisms, if any, but may in its discretion issuerelease the reprimand as originally prepared. (8) After the board has determined to issue a Formal Complaint, the judge shall be given the opportunity to meet with a representative of the board, but the board is not required to delay filing the Formal Complaint. .(2}_The board shall notify the judge of its action and shall disclose the names of the board members who did not participate in the action. *** (b) Access to Transcripts and Recordings. Upon request by the board, the judge shall order and provide a transcript of the portions of hearings requested by the board. See 13 Minn. Stat.§ 486.06. Notwithstanding Rule 4, subdivision 3 of the Rules of Public Access to Records of the Judicial Branch, the board may also obtain audio recordings of court proceedings. (Amended effective January 1, 1996; amended effective March 30, 1999; amended effective July 1, 2009; amended effective July 1, 2016.) AdYisory Committee Comment 1999 A.mendment The change in Rt:tle 6(d)(l)(i) 1'eeegnizes that the BefH'-tii en Jbtdieial Standa1'ris l'IU:lypffleeed di1'CeUy 1e isst:tanee &ja f<:JrH'lal eemplaintt:tndC1' Rt:tk 8 ·when the1'0 has been a 1'Ciated pt:tblie p1'8eeeding befo1'0 the Lt:fwye1's ..T7f?_lessienal Responsibility Betl1'd invehring eendt:tet of a jt:trige that eeet:tHed p1'ie1' 1e the jt:trige asst:tming jt:tdieial e.ffiee. In these ei1'et:tmstanees the p1'8eedbt1'e t:tnde1' Rt:tk 7 may e1'lly ser¥e 1e delay the disciplinary p1'eeess. A/adifiealiens 1e Rt:tle 6(d)(l)(ii) all-ew the betl1'd 1e st:tbmil a pfflPesedpt:tblie 1'Cp1'imand 1e the jt:trige f<:J1' eendt:tet that is t:tnaeeeptable bt:tt net se se1'iel:tS as te waHant furthC1' discipline, e.g., a eenst:t1'0, by· the 8Mp1'Cme Cet:t1'1. Disciplinary bedies in ethC1'jt:t1'isdieliens have simila1' at:tthe1'ity. &e, e.g., Rt:tk 6(g)(l), Rt:tks &j Pffleedt:tf'C fa1' the A1'izena Cemmissien en .htdieial Cendt:tet; Rt:tks &/the Geergia .htdieial Qt:talifieatiens Cemmissien, Dcfin#ien (e). The change is b'llemied 1e p1'8vide the beal'd with guidance l'Cgal'ding whe1'l # is app1'ep1'iate te p1'8eeeri di1'Ce#y 1e a p1'epesed 1'Cp1'ima1'ld (which is st:thjeette a jt:trige 's 1'ightte demand a fa1'mal hea1'ing b~fo1'e the 1'Cp1'imand is made pt:tblic) in liet:t &jfo1'mal eha1'ges t:tndC1' Rt:tks 7and8. AdYisory Committee Comment 2009 Amendment Rt:tk 6(d) (1) (i) all-ews the beal'd 1e stay p1'eeeedings pel'lding aetiel'l by anethC1' agency 81' eet:t1't. &eh p1'eeeedings il'ldl:tde e1·iminalp1'8seet:ttien, ei·;il litigation, and adminisuati}'C aetien by 1'Cgl:tlatery agencies. Rule 6Z. Procedure for Conduct Occurring Prior to Assumption of Judicial Office *** Advisory Committee Comment 1999 1'\mendment Rt:tle 6Z et:t#ines the p1'8eess fo1' handling eemplaints eel'leeming eendbtet by a jt:trige be.f81'0 asst:tming jt:tdieial &ffiee. Related changes gl'ant the Lmtrye1's P+'&.fessienal Respensihility• Beaffl:jt:t1'isdietien 1e eensiriC1' whethe1' st:teh eendt:tet waHants lm•')'e1' discipline, while the Beaffl: en Jbtdieial Standsl'ds 1'01ains jt:t1'isdietien te eensiriC1' whethC1' the same eendl:tet waHal'lts jt:tdieial discipline. R.Bd..htd.&d. 2; R.L.PnJ:f:Resp. 6Z(a). 14 Theptvnisiens efRule 6Z(s) (d) are Fepeated in R.L.PFef:Resp. 6Z(h)(l) (4). The eemmitlee felt that Fepetitien ef t."'e signifieant pt'eeeduffll pt'ei>'isiens was mere een·;enient and appFepFiale than a &ess Fcfaenee. Rule 6Z(s) requiFes the staffefthe LfflyYCFS Pt<efessienal Respe1'1sihility Beard a1'1d the Judicial StandaFds Beat'd te netifl each etha aheut eemplaints eeneemb<tg eenduet by a judge eeeut't'b<tg hf7jore the judge assumedjudieial effiee. l 1l8tiee is net required if all pt'eeeedit<tgs relatit<tg te the inquiry, in'lestigatien eF eemplaint haw been Feselved before the judge assumedjudieial e.ffiee. Rule 6Z(s) neitha ineFeases net' deeFeases the autheFity e:l the exeeuti·;e seeFetaty· et' Office e}LtflvyeFS :~.Pfflfessienal Respensihility te in'lestigate et' act en any matter. That autheFity is ge·..emed by etha Fules. Rule 6-Z(s) merely establishes a mutual duty te Pffl'lide netiee aheut cemplaints eF inquiFies cenceming cenduct efajudge eeeuFFb<tg hcfere thejudge assumedjudieial effiee. Altheugh a fait' l'lumheF efeemplaints Feeeh-•ed by the exeeuti·;e seaetary and the Office efPF&jcssienal Respensihility aFe :fri·;eleus, there have been relatively few eemplab'lts cencel"ning cenduct eccut't'ingpYiel" te a judge assuming judicial effiee. Thus, the cemmittee helie'les t."'at this pt'ecedul"e will net resul-t b'l a needless diiplicatien efcjfoFts. Unda Rule 6-Z(h) it is eel'llemplated that eemplaints aheut the cenduet efajudge eeeut't'ingpYiel" te the judge assumingjudieial effiee will he h'lwstigated h'l thefost h'lstal'lCC hy the Office &jLtflVJlCI"S Pt<e.fessim'lal Respensihility, and the resul-ts weuld he diselesed te the Beat'd e1'1 Judicial8tal'ldcu¥is. d.Jud.Std. 5(s)(4); R.L.:~.V,.efResp. 20(s) (1 0). This all-eH'S feY efficient and effective use e.l il'l';estigative reseurees by beth disciplinary heaYds. Rule 6Z(c) autheYizes the Beat'd en Judicial Standal"ds te pt'eceed diYectly te issuance efafoYmal cemplaint undel" Rule 8 when there has been a relatedpuhlic pt'eeeeding Ul'ldeF the Rules en LawyeFS Pt<e.fessienal Respensihility iw;e['ling em'lduet efajudge that eceut't'edpFieF te thejudge assumingjudieial e.ffiee. In t."'ese eit'Cutnstanees the pt'eeedul"e undel" Rule 7 may enly seYVe te delay the disciplinary pYecess. Rule 6Z(c) dees netpfflhihit the Beat'den Judieial8tandcu¥is:frempl"eceeding te public disciplinary pt'eceedings h'l eases h'l which enly pYi'lale discipline (e.g., an adn'lenitien) has been impesed undel" the Rules en Lawyel"s :~.~.fessienal Respensihility joY cenduct efajudge eccut't'ingpYiel" te thejudge assuming judicial e.ffiee. In these eases, the Beat'tim'l Judieial8tal'ldal"ds weuld he Yequired te .fol/e·,v Rule 7 (1:mless, efceuFse, the matleF is reselved eaFlier, feF example, by disn'lissal eF public I"Cpl"imand). Rule 6Z(d) authel"i&es the use ef t.~e heaYing recet'd and the findit<tgs and Yecemmendatiens ef the la'ivyel" disciplinary pt'ecess in t.~e judicial disciplinary pt'ecess. This is intended te stl"eamline the judicial disciplil'lary heaYing when there has already been a feYmal fact finding heaYing in the lffl.,}'Ct' disciplinary pYecess, CJndpamits the &preme Ceut't te Fuk Bl'l beth diseiplb'laty· n'latteFS as quickly as pessihle. 15 Under Ruk 6Z(d) it is contemplated that the hearing record 8:1'ld thefotdings and conclusions ofthe lawyer diseipli1'18:r:ypFOcess will: he thejirst e·;idence introduced in the Rttk }{}jttdieial diseipl:inar:y hearing. Ceunselfar the hoard and thejttdge me:y• he permitted to introduce additional e'lidenee rele·;ant to alleged Code ef .ffldieial Cenduet -;iolations at the hearing. Ceunsel must he aw8:1-e that there mey he situatim'ls in which the introdttetien efadditional evidence will l'lot he permiHed. See, e.g., In re Gillard, 26{) N W.2d 562, 564 (Aiirm. 1977) (afler re-;ie"w qfhearing record and findings and conclusions from lawyer disciplinary process, Supreme Court ruled that findings weuld not be subject te eellateral attaek in the related judicial disciplinary pFOeeeding 8:1'ld that additienal e'lidenee H'lB:y he introduced only 8:8 a result e.,-41 stipulation er order of'thefae~jinder); In Fe Gil-lard, 27l N. W.2d 785, 8{)9 (Minn. 1978) (tipholding remo·;al8:1'lddisharment where &ardon ul:ttdieial Stan:dards 8:8 faetjinder refused te consider additim'lal testimony but a!:Jowe~jili~tg &}deposition and exhibits and made alJemati·;e findings h8:Sed on those :filings). Although the fflles d8 not expressly pro-;ide for a pre hearing eonferenee, it is contemplated that admissibility issues will be reso[wd h:y· the presider efthe foet find:ing panel sbtjjieiently in adw:lnee e.,-r the hearing to al-low the parties adefjuate time to prepare for the hearing. Rule 7. [Deleted effeeth·e July 1, 2009.] Rule 7. Admonition Review Hearing. (a) Hearing Panel. If a judge makes a timely demand for a private hearing as provided in Rule 6(Q( 6), the board shall ask the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to appoint a panel as provided in Rule 8(b). The judge shall be identified by number or randomly selected initials in the proceeding. The board shall notify the complainant, if any, of the judge's demand for a hearing. (b) Panel Procedures. The procedures in Rule 9 and Rule lO(a) and (b) shall apply to an admonition review hearing except that the hearing shall be confidential and Rule 9(b) shall apply only to the extent permitted by this Rule. Depositions shall not be allowed, provided that the panel presider, for good cause shown, may authorize a subpoena and deposition of a witness living outside the state or physically unable to attend the hearing. The panel shall review the proposed admonition de novo. (c) Form of Evidence at Admonition Review Hearing. The panel shall receive evidence only in the form of affidavits or other documents except for testimony by: ( 1) The judge; (2) A witness whose testimony the review panel presider authorizes for good cause. If testimony is authorized, the presider may authorize the issuance of a subpoena under Rule 9(b). 16 (d) Disposition. The panel shall make written findings and conclusions. If the panel finds that any alleged violation is supported by clear and convincing evidence, the panel may affirm the admonition or, if the panel finds that the judge's misconduct warrants public discipline, the panel may recommend that the board issue a public reprimand or a Formal Complaint. If the board does not accept a panel's recommendation to issue a public reprimand or a Formal Complaint, the admonition reviewed by the panel shall become final. The panel shall dismiss the complaint if there is not clear and convincing evidence supporting the violation(s) alleged in the admonition. (e) Review by Supreme Court. The judge may petition the Minnesota Supreme Court to review a panel's affirmance of an admonition by filing a petition with the clerk of the appellate courts in accordance with Rule 117, subdivision 3 of the Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure within 30 days of being served with the review panel's decision. The judge shall be identified by number or randomly selected initials in the proceeding. The board may respond in accordance with Rule 117, subdivision 4 of the Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure. If review is granted, the matter shall proceed under Rule 14 of these Rules. (Added effective July 1, 2016.) Rule 8. Formal Complaint or Formal Statement of Disability Proceeding and Notice (a) Formal Complaint or Formal Statement of Disability Proceeding. (1) The Formal Complaint or Formal Statement of Disability Proceeding shall set forth the charges against the judge, the factual allegations and the time within which these rules require the judge to serve a written response. Where more than one act of misconduct is alleged, each shall be clearly set forth. (2) The judge shall be served promptly with a copy of the Formal Complaint or Formal Statement of Disability Proceeding. Service shall be accomplished .Qy admission of service or certified mail, or in accordance with the Rules of Civil Procedure. (3) The judge shall serve a written response on the board within 20 days after service of the Formal Complaint or Formal Statement of Disability Proceeding. (4) The executive secretary shall file the Formal Complaint or Formal Statement of Disability Proceeding and the written response, if any, with the Supreme Court, within 30 days of service of the Formal Complaint or Formal Statement of Disability Proceeding unless the matter is resolved. The filing time may be extended by agreement of the board and the judge. *** (c) Notice ofHearing. 17 (1) The hearing panel shall schedule a public hearing. The date shall be selected to afford the judge ample time to prepare for the hearing, but shall not be later than 90 days after the filing of the Formal Complaint or Formal Statement of Disability Proceeding with the Supreme Court. The judge and all counsel shall be notified of the time and place of the hearing. (2) If the presider allows the amendment of the Formal Complaint or Formal Statement of Disability Proceeding, or in compellingln extraordinary circumstances, the hearing panel shall have the authority to extend the hearing date as it deems proper. (d) Disclosure in Public Proceedings. Notwithstanding Rule 5, in a public reprimand, a Formal Complaint, and in proceedings before a panel under this rule or Rule 7, the board may disclose private discipline previously imposed on the judge. (e) Failure to Answer/Failure to Appear. A judge's failure to answer the Formal Complaint or failure to attend the panel hearing, unless excused by the presider for good cause shown, shall constitute an admission of the factual allegations of the Formal Complaint. (Amended effective January 1, 1996; amended effective July 1, 2009; amended effective July 1, 2016.) Rule 9. Discovery (a) Initial DisclosuresWitaesses; Depasitiaas. Within 20 days after the service of a response, or after the e1cpiration of the time for serYi6e of a response, whi6heYer 066\:H'S fifst;--counsel for the board and the judge shall exchange the names and addresses of all persons known to have knowledge of the relevant facts. The presider of the hearing panel shall set a date for the exchange of the names and addresses of all witnesses the parties intend to call at the hearing. Subpoenas and depositions shall be goYemed by Rule 2(e). (b) Subpoenas and Depositions. Subpoenas for inspection of documents, depositions, and the hearing may be issued only with the prior approval of the presider. Counsel for the board may take the deposition of the judge. The board and the judge may apply to the presider to take the deposition of witnesses who are unavailable to testify at the hearing. Depositions of other persons may be taken only if the presider finds that the party's need for the deposition outweighs the burdens placed on the deponent and on the other party and does not significantly delay the proceedings. The presider shall issue a protective order in accordance with Rule 26.03, Rules of Civil Procedure, when necessary to reduce the burdens on a deponent. Subpoenas shall be issued by the Ramsey County District Court upon presentation of the presider' s authorization for the subpoena. (c) Other Evidence. Counsel for the board and the judge shall exchange: 18 (1) non-privileged evidence relevant to the Formal Complaint, documents to be presented at the hearing, witness statements, and summaries of interviews with witnesses who will be called at the hearing; and (2) other material only upon good cause shown to the presider ofth:e panel. This rule shall not limit the judge's access to the file under Rule 5(h). Upon request by the board or the judge and for good cause shown, t+he presider may authorize service of interrogatories and requests for production of documents and may direct the judge to sign authorizations for release of informationupon request by th:e board or th:e judge. *** (f) Completion of Discovery. All discovery shall be completed within 60 days of the service of the response or the expiration of the time for service of the response, whichever occurs first unless upon a showing of good cause, the presider extends the time. (g) Failure to Disclose. The presider of the hearing panel may preclude either party from calling a witness at the hearing if the party has not provided the opposing party with the witness' name and address, any statements taken from the witness or summaries of any interviews with the witness. (h) Resolution of Disputes. Disputes concerning discovery, including subpoenas and depositions, shall be determined by the presider of the hearing panel before whom the matter is pending. The decisions of the presider may not be appealed before entry of the panel's disposition in the disciplinary proceeding. (i) Civil Rules Not Applicable. Proceedings under these rules are not subject to the Rules of Civil Procedure regarding discovery except that Rules 26.03, 30.02-.07, 32.04-.05, and 37.04 are applicable to the extent that they are consistent with these rules. (Amended effective January 1, 1996; amended effective July 1, 2009; amended effective July 1, 2016.) Rule 10. Public Hearing *** (c) Amendments. By leave of the presider of the panel for good cause shown or by consent of the judge, the Formal Complaint or Formal Statement of Disability Proceeding may be amended after commencement of the hearing if the judge and the judge's counsel are given adequate time to prepare a response. Leave to amend shall be freely granted when justice so requires. 19 (Amended effective January 1, 1996; amended effective July 1, 2009; amended effective July 1, 2016.) Rule 11. Findings, Disposition, and Appeal (a) Findings. The hearing panel shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether there is clear and convincing evidence that the judge committed misconduct under the grounds for discipline in Rule 4. The panel shall file its findings and conclusions within 60 days after the case is submitted to the panel unless the Chief Justice, on request of the presider, extends the time for good cause shown. If the panel finds there is not clear and convincing evidence, the panel shall dismiss the case. If the panel finds there is clear and convincing evidence, the panel shall impose or recommend sanctions under Rule 11 (b). (b) Disposition. If the hearing panel finds clear and convincing evidence of misconduct, the panel may: ( l) enter into a deferred disposition agreement for a speeified period of time upon reasonable eonditions, and the agreement may speeify the disposition upon eompletion; ( 1) issue a public reprimand; or (2) recommend any of the following sanctions to the Supreme Court: (i) Removal; (ii) Retirement; (iii) Imposing discipline as an attorney; (iv) Imposing limitations or conditions on the performance of judicial duties; (v) Censure; (vi) Imposing a civil penalty; (vii) Suspension with or without pay; or (viii) Any combination of the above sanctions. (c) Filing and Service. The hearing panel must file its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and disposition with the Supreme Court within 7 days after issuance of the disposition. The panel shall serve copies on the board and respondent judge. Proof of service shall also be filed with the Supreme Court. (d) Appeal. The board or judge may appeal the disposition of the hearing panel by filing a notice of appeal with the clerk of the appellate courts within 10 days after the panel serves the disposition on the parties. The appeal shall proceed under Rule 14. +he disposition of the panel beeomes final if no appeal is taken within 60 days after issuanee of the disposition. If the panel determines it is appropriate to issue a public reprimand, the reprimand shall be stayed until the time for appeal has run or any appeal is completed. If there is no appeal from a dismissal or reprimand, the disposition of the panel becomes final. 20 A party's failure to timely appeal a panel's findings, conclusions, and/or recommendation for discipline constitutes acceptance thereof. A party seeking to challenge a finding of fact or conclusion by the panel shall order a transcript if a transcript has not already been prepared. (Amended effective January 1, 1996; amended effective March 30, 1999; amended effective July 1, 2009; amended effective July 1, 2016.) AdYisory Committee Comment 1999 Amendment Rlik 11 (d) (5) hCES been medijied by deleting FCpriman~fi'em the list E>jsanetiens that msy he issl:ted s.fter a formal hearing. Under Rl:tle 6(d)(l)(ii), a FCprimand msy• he issl:ted by the heard withel:tt resert te formal preeeedings in sitl:tatiens im;ehring ee19dl:tet that is l:tnaeeeptahle l:tnder e19e E>jthe g'I¥Jl:t19cis far }l:tdieial discipline bl:tt 19et se seriel:tS CIS te ·,yarrant further discipline, sl:teh as a ee19SWC, by the &preme Cel:trt. *** Rule 13. Disposition by Consent (a) Agreement. At any time after issuanee of the Formal Complaint or Formal 8tatement of Disability Proeeeding and before eonelusion of any hearing panel proeeedings under Rules 10, 11, and Hi, the judge and the board may enter into an agreement in which the judge admits to any or all of the charges or allegations of disability in exchange for a stated disposition or recommended disposition. Entry into the agreement shall stay the proceedings of tftef! panel. The agreement shall set forth: ( 1) a statement of the facts; (2) the allegations to which the judge is admitting; and (3) the agreed-upon disposition. (b) Disposition. If the agreed-upon disposition is one the board is authorized to impose under Rule 6(t)(4) or (5), proceedings before the hearing panel shall terminate, and the board shall impose the disposition. If the agreed-upon disposition is one the board is not authorized to impose under Rule 6(f)(4), the agreement shall be submitted to the Supreme Court. The Court shall either enter an order implementing or rejecting the agreement. If the stated disposition is rejected by the Supreme Court, the agreement may be withdrawn but the facts admitted to in the agreement can be used against the judge in such further proceedings as the Court may direct. (Added effective July 1, 2009; amended effective July 1, 2016.) 21 Rule 14. Supreme Court Review (a) Prompt Consideration. Upon the filing of a recommendation for discipline or disability retirement, the Court shall promptly docket the matter for expedited consideration, but not sooner than the end of the time allowed for appeal of the panel's disposition by the board or judge. Ifthe board or judge appeals the disposition ofthe hearing panel, the Court shall eonsider the reeommended disposition under Rule ll(b)(3) or Rule 16(f)( 1)(ii) at the same time as any appeal regarding those reeommendations. (b) Briefs. The board shall, and the judge may, file briefs with the Court in aeeordanee with the requirements of Minn. R. CiY. App. P. 128 .•Any party seeking to ehallenge a finding offaet by the panel shall order a transeript.Briefs shall be filed with the Court in accordance with Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 128 and 130-132 except as modified in this rule. Unless the Court otherwise orders, ( 1) If one party has appealed, the appellant shall file a brief within 21 days after filing the notice of appeal, the respondent shall file a brief within 21 days after service of appellant's brief, and the appellant may file a reply within 10 days after service of respondent's brief. (2) If both parties have appealed, the appellant shall file a brief within 21 days after filing the notice of appeal, the respondent/cross-appellant shall file a brief within 21 days after service of appellant's brief, the appellant shall file a response and reply brief within 14 days after service of respondent's brief, and the respondent may file a reply within 10 days after service of the appellant's response and reply brief. (3) If neither party has appealed, the board shall, and the judge may, file a brief not exceeding seven pages within 14 days after the time to appeal has expired, and no reply briefs shall be filed; and ( 4) A brief may be stapled rather than formally bound. (c) Additional Findings and Filings; Supplemental Record. (1) If the Court desires an expansion of the record or additional findings with respect either to the recommendation for discipline or to the sanction to be imposed, it shall remand the matter to the hearing panel with appropriate directions, retaining jurisdiction, and shall stay proceedings pending receipt of the panel's filing of the additional record. (2) The Court may order additional filings or oral argument as to specified issues or the entire matter. (3) The Court without remand and prior to the imposition of discipline may accept or solicit supplementary filings with respect to medical or other information, provided that the parties have notice and an opportunity to be heard. Delay for Further Proceedings. The Court, on receipt of notice of an additional proceeding before the board involving the same judge, may stay proceedings pending the board's termination of this additional proceeding. In the event that additional (d) 22 recommendations for discipline of the judge are filed, the Court may impose a single sanction covering all recommendations. (e) Decision. When the hearing panel recommends the Supreme Court impose sanctions under Rule 11 (b )(~.f.), the Court shall review the record of the proceedings, giving deference to the panel's fmdings of facts, and shall file a written opinion and judgment directing such discipline or other action as it concludes is just and proper. If the judge or board has filed an appeal under Rule 11 (d), the Court may accept the recommendation of the panel, or reject or modify it in whole or in part. (f) Consideration of Lawyer Discipline. When the hearing panel recommends the suspension or removal of a judge, the Court shall promptly notify the judge and the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board and give them an opportunity to be heard in the Court on the issue of lawyer discipline. *** (Amended effective January 1, 1996; amended effective July 1, 2009; amended effective July 1, 2016.) Rule 15. Interim Suspension *** (c) Review ofPeFmissive Interim Suspension. Any judge suspended under section (b) of this rule shall be given a prompt hearing and determination by the Supreme Court upon application for review of the interim suspension order. (Amended effective January 1, 1996; amended effective July 1, 2009; amended effective July 1 2016.) Rule 16. Special Provisions for Cases Involving Disability (a) Proceedings in General. When it appears that a judge may have a disability as defmed in these rulesan inquiry alleges faets that eould eonstitute disability, the board shall follow the same procedures used with respect to misconduct, except as modified by this rule. Initiation of lnguirvPFaeeedings. The board may initiate an inquiry into a case involving disability: (1) upon receiving a complaint alleging conduct that may be due to a disability; (2) when an investigation indicates the alleged conduct may be due to disability; Of (3) when the judge asserts inability to defend in a disciplinary proceeding due to a (b) 23 disability; (4) upon request of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court; or (5) upon the board's own motion. *** (t) Hearing. Upon issuance of a Formal Statement of Disability Proceeding, a hearing shall be held under Rules 10 and 11 to determine whether there is clear and convincing evidence the judge has a disability. If the board has also filed a Formal Complaint, the hearing panel shall determine whether there is clear and convincing evidence that the judge committed misconduct and whether the misconduct was related to a disability. The panel may exclude the public from portions of the proceedings to hear evidence on psychological or medical materials or other evidence that would not be accessible to the public. (1) If the hearing panel finds clear and convincing evidence of a disability, the panel may: (i) enter into a deferred disposition agreement as provided in Rule 11(b)(1); or (ii) recommend any of the following actions to the Supreme Court: (A) Removal; (B) Disability retirement if the disability is or is likely to become permanent; (C) Imposition of limitations or conditions on the performance of judicial duties; (D) Suspension with or without pay; or (E) Any combination of the above actions. (2) The hearing panel may also impose or recommend a disciplinary disposition with regard to misconduct, if applicable, pursuant to Rule 11 (b). (3) Any disposition of the hearing panel is public. (4) The board or judge may appeal the decision of the hearing panel as provided in Rule 11(d). *** (h) Representation by Counsel. If the judge in any proceeding under this rule is not represented by counsel, the board or, if a hearing panel has been appointed, the presider ofthe panel, shall appoint an attorney to represent the judge at public expense. (Amended effective January 1, 1996; amended effective July 1, 2009; amended effective July 1, 2016.) Rule 17. Involuntary Retirement (a) Procedure. A judge who refuses to retire voluntarily may be involuntarily retired by the Supreme Court. If attempts to convince a judge to retire voluntarily fail, then 24 the board shall proceed as provided in Rules 8, 9, 10, and 11. The Supreme Court shall then proceed as provided in Rule -!; 14. *** (Amended effective January 1, 1996; amended effective July 1, 2009; amended effective July 1, 2016.) *** Rule 19. Expungement The executive secretary shall expunge records as follows: (a) Dismissals. All records or evidence of a complaint where the board did not find reasonable cause to believe the judge committed misconduct or where the board did not find reasonable cause to believe the judge has a disability shall be destroyed tffi=eefour years after the board receives the complaint or authorizes an investigation, whichever occurs first, except that an expungement shall be accomplished by the board's staff no later than two months after the time to expunge the file occurs. If the board receives a new complaint involYing the same judge within the three years, the new complaint shall renew the three year period. (b) Case Files on Deceased Judges. All case files on deceased judges shall be destroyed, unless the file reflects a public proceeding concerning the judge, in which case the board may retain the key documents in the file. *** (Added effective January 1, 1996; amended effective July 1, 2009; amended effective July 1, 2016.) Rule 20. Use of Allegations from Dismissed Inquiries (a) Use of Allegations in General. Allegations from an inquiry that was dismissed shall not be referred to by the board in any subsequent proceedings or used for any purpose in any judicial or lawyer disciplinary proceeding against the judge, except as provided in this rule. Allegations from a dismissed inquiry may be reinvestigated with permission of the board if, within tffi=eefour years after dismissal, additional information becomes known to the board regarding the inquiry. (b) Use of Allegations From Dismissal with Letter of Caution. Allegations from an inquiry dismissed with a letter of caution may be used within three years after 25 dismissal in subsequent proceedings only as follows: (i) The fact that the inquiry was dismissed with a letter of caution may not be used to establish the misconduct alleged in a subsequent proceeding. However, the underlying conduct described in the letter of caution may be charged in a subsequent Formal Complaint within four years after dismissal, and evidence in support thereof may be presented to the hearing panel at the public hearing under Rule 10. (ii) If the underlying conduct described in the letter of caution is charged in a subsequent Formal Complaint, and the hearing panel finds the judge committed misconduct with respect to the facts underlying the dismissal with letter of caution, the letter of caution may be considered by the panel in determining an appropriate sanction. (iii) A letter of caution may be used to show that a judge was on notice that the conduct described in the letter of caution could violate the Code of Judicial Conduct. (Added effective July 1, 2009; amended effective July 1, 2016.) *** Rule 23. Service and Computation of Time. Service on a party represented by counsel shall be made on the attorney. In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by these rules or by order of court. the method of computation specified in Rules 6.01 and 6.05, Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure, shall be used. (Added effective July 1, 2016.) 26

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.