List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED May 29, 2013.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW
Filed – May 29, 2013
(Petitioner indicated in Italic Type)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
State of Minnesota vs. Carnell Cobb – A12-0362 – Denied
State of Minnesota vs. Jeremy Donald Schwartz – A12-0465 – Denied
In the Matter of the Welfare of: J.H., Child. – A12-1405 – Granted
Bradley Ronald Stevens vs. State of Minnesota – A12-0916 – Denied
State of Minnesota vs. Steve Albert Cooper – A12-0097 – Denied
Frankie Earl Miller vs. State of Minnesota – A12-0766 – Denied
William Antonio McClendon vs. State of Minnesota – A12-0982 – Denied
State of Minnesota vs. Willie James Patterson – A12-0476 – Denied
State of Minnesota vs. Joseph Leo Dohmen – A12-0836 – Denied
U.S. Bank, N.A. vs. Ogonnaya Vincent Ofor, Lisa Ofor, Defendant – A12-0881
Denied
In re the Marriage of: Stacy Lynn Blair, n/k/a Stacy Lynn Meyer vs. Michael
Jeffrey Blair, a/k/a Max Blair – A12-1154 – Denied
State of Minnesota vs. Nathan Obeta – A12-0260 – Denied
State of Minnesota vs. Demarcus L. Barker – A12-0406 – Denied
State of Minnesota vs. Michael Peter Henderson – A12-0623 – Denied
Target Corporation vs. Frito-Lay, Inc. – A12-0747 – Denied
James Joseph Klaseus vs. State of Minnesota – A12-0267 – Denied
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Cedrick Scott Ince. – A12-1691
Granted
State of Minnesota vs. Kadie Leeper – A12-0720 – Denied
State of Minnesota vs. Jonquil B. Neal – A12-0676 – Denied
State of Minnesota vs. Dale Channing Casebolt – A11-0291, A12-1645 – Denied
State of Minnesota vs. Donovan Eric Strong – A12-0521 – Denied
State of Minnesota vs. Dwayne Peterson – A12-0431 – Denied
Lakes Area Business Association, et al. vs. City of Forest Lake, et al. – A13-0698
Petition for Accelerated Review – Denied
Raymond Leon Semler vs. State of Minnesota – A12-1570 – Denied
Yvonne Frances Soto vs. Benjamin Mario Soto – A13-0522 – Denied
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
