In re Petition for Reinstatement of Anthony D. Crosby, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 254009.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A12-0704 In re Petition for Reinstatement of Anthony D. Crosby, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 254009. ORDER In April 1998 we suspended petitioner Anthony Durriell Crosby from the practice of law for five years for committing theft by swindle. In re Crosby, 577 N.W.2d 711, 711 (Minn. 1998) (order). Petitioner applied for reinstatement in April 2012, and a hearing was held before a panel of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board. The panel found that petitioner has proven by clear and convincing evidence that he is morally fit to resume the practice of law. See In re Swanson, 343 N.W.2d 662, 664 (Minn. 1984) (providing that the burden is on the attorney to establish by clear and convincing evidence the moral fitness to resume the practice of law). The panel recommends that petitioner be reinstated to the practice of law and placed on supervised probation for a period of two years. The Director defers to the panel s recommendation. Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner Anthony D. Crosby be reinstated to the practice of law and placed on probation for a period of two years, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1 (a) Petitioner shall cooperate fully with the efforts of the Director s office to monitor compliance with this probation. Petitioner shall promptly respond to the Director s correspondence by the due date. Petitioner shall cooperate with the Director s investigation of any allegations of unprofessional conduct that may come to the Director s attention. Upon the Director s request, petitioner shall authorize the release of information and documentation to verify compliance with the terms of this probation; (b) Petitioner shall abide by the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct; (c) Petitioner shall be supervised by a licensed Minnesota attorney appointed by the Director to monitor compliance with the terms of this probation. Within 30 days of the date of filing of this order, petitioner shall provide the Director with the names of four attorneys who have agreed to be nominated as petitioner s supervisor. If, after diligent effort, petitioner is unable to locate a supervisor acceptable to the Director, the Director will seek to nominate a supervisor. Until a supervisor has signed a consent to supervise, petitioner shall, on the first day of each month, provide the Director with an inventory of client files as described below and shall make active client files available to the Director upon request; (d) Petitioner shall cooperate fully with the supervisor s efforts to monitor compliance with this probation; and (e) Within 60 days of the date of filing of this order, petitioner shall provide the Director and his probation supervisor, if one has been appointed, with a detailed written plan outlining his plans to practice law. Petitioner shall update the plan whenever any change in his practice occurs. Petitioner shall provide the Director and his probation supervisor with progress reports as they may request. Dated: January 24, 2013 BY THE COURT: /s/ Alan C. Page Associate Justice 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
