List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED April 17, 2012.

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW Filed February 27, 2013 (Petitioner indicated in Italic Type) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. James Louis Peppin vs. Commissioner of Public Safety A12-0164 Denied State of Minnesota vs. Roshawn White A11-0698 Denied State of Minnesota vs. Davante Rashaud Harrington A12-1146 Denied State of Minnesota vs. Larry Allen Nelson A12-0071 Granted Melvin Manypenny vs. State of Minnesota A12-0796 Denied State of Minnesota vs. Lester Ray Wiley A12-0266 Denied In re the Matter of the Blossom Mary Spencer Irrevocable Trust, Kathleen M. Mosloski, et al. vs. Kevin Spencer, et al. A12-0444 Denied In re the Trust of James Bernard Spencer Irrevocable Trust, Kathleen M. Mosloski, et al. vs. Kevin Spencer, et al. A12-0565 Denied State of Minnesota vs. Dawn Marie Dircks A11-2011 Denied Paul David Faga vs. State of Minnesota A12-0472 Denied State of Minnesota vs. Edmund Charles Roskoski A12-0508 Denied Carl Green d/b/a Signature Capital, as assignee for Bob Kent Well Drilling vs. Robert Clark, Decedent, Elizabeth Nelson, Christian Clark, Pine County Sheriff's Department, Interested Observer A12-0991 Denied State of Minnesota vs. Michael Walter Crego A12-0588 Denied State of Minnesota vs. Manlear Peter A12-0835 Denied State of Minnesota vs. Allen Michael Stark A12-0579 Denied State of Minnesota vs. James Edward Reed A11-2146 Denied State of Minnesota vs. Travis Allan Olsen A12-0123 Denied Zahra Kaliveh, et al. vs. Target Clinic Medical Associates Minnesota, LLC d/b/a Target Clinic and/or Target Corporation A12-0962 Denied In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Karl Leonard Meyer. A12-1390 Denied State of Minnesota, by its Minnesota Pollution Control Agency vs. Daniel Nosbush A12-0953 Denied State Farm Insurance Companies vs. Arecely Padilla A12-0928 Denied Jerome Eugene Vann vs. State of Minnesota A12-0765 Denied

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.