ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR NO-FAULT ARBITRATION.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF APPELLATE GOMTS IN SUPREME COURT ADM-09-80 11 (formerly C6-74-45550) ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR NO-FAULT ARBITRATION The Standing Committee for Administration of No-Fault Arbitration has recommended certain amendments to the Rules of Procedure for No-Fault Arbitration; and The court has considered the proposals and public comments received and is advised in the premises. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The attached amendments to the Rules of Procedure for No-Fault Arbitration be and the same are prescribed and promulgated to be effective on June 1, 2. These amendments shall apply to all actions or proceedings pending on or commenced on or after the effective date. 3. The inclusion of Standing Committee comments is made for convenience and does not reflect court approval of the comments. Dated: May 3,20 18 BY THE COURT: AMENDMENTS THE RULES PROCEDURE TO OF' FOR NO-FAULT ARBITRATION [Note: new material is indicated by underscoring, except committee comments, which are all new; deleted material is indicated by strikethrough.] Rule 10. Qualification of Arbitrator and Disclosure Procedure a. Every member of the panel shall be a licensed attorney at law of this state or a retired attorney or judge in good standing. Effective January 1, 2004, requirements for qualification as an arbitrator shall be: (1) at least 5 years in practice in this state; (2) at least one-third of the attorney's practice is with auto insurance claims or, for an attorney not actively representing clients, at least onethird of an ADR practice is with motor vehicle claims or not-fault matters; (3) completion of an arbitrator training program approved by the No-Fault Standing Committee prior to appointment to the panel; (4) at least three CLE hours on nofault issues within their reporting period; and (5) arbitrators will be required to recertify each year, confirming at the time of recertification that they continue to meet the above requirements. b. No person shall serve as an arbitrator in any arbitration in which he or she has a financial or personal conflict of i n t e r e s t d . Under procedures established by the Standing Committee and immediately following appointment a to case, every arbitrator shall be required to disclose any circumstances likely to create a presumption or possibility of bias or conflict that may disqualify the person as a potential arbitrator. &Every require. Eash arbitrator shall supplement the disclosures as circumstances a a , T h e fact that an arbitrator or the arbitrator's firm represents automobile accident claimants against insurance companies or self-insureds, including the respondent, does not create a presumption of bias. It is a financial conflict of interest if, within the last year, the appointed arbitrator or the arbitrator's firm has been hired by the respondent to represent the respondent or respondent's insureds in a dispute for which respondent provides insurance coverage. It is a financial conflict of interest if the appointed arbitrator is aware of having received referrals within the last year from officers, employees or agents of any entity whose bills are in dispute in the arbitration or the arbitrator's firm has received such referrals and the arbitrator is aware of them. c. If m a n arbitrator has been certified and h m e t the requirements of subdivision (a) for the past five years but he-a3hebecomes ineligible for certification under Rule 10(a) bewwc he C e d u e . . to retirement or change in practice, the arbitrator may continue to seek annual certification for up to five years from the date of retirement or practice change if h t e - following requirements- satisfied: & T -h -e arbitrator completes and files an annual No-Fault Arbitrator Recertification form++ 1. which certifies thatke 2. He or she is an attorney licensed to practice law in Minnesota and is in good s t a n d i n g ; d 2. He or she has retained current knowledge of the Minnesota No-Fault Act (Minn. Stat. 5s 65B.41-65B.71), Minnesota appellate court decisions interpreting the Act, the Minnesota No-Fault Arbitration Rules and the Arbitrators' Standards of Conduct; and 3. C H e or she has attended CLE course(s) in the last year containing at least three credits relating to no-fault matters. c. The rules regarding bias and conflict of interest as set forth in subdivision @(b) remain applicable to arbitrators who are recertified under &subdivision @@. Committee Comment to Rule 10 Amendments In recent years, there have been inconsistencies in district court rulings and in determinations by the Standing Committee as to what constitutes a conflict of interest for no-fault arbitrators. In response, the Standing Committee wishes to clarify what constitutes a conflict of interest for both respondents' and claimants' attorneys. The Committee recognizes that the Amendments will limit the number of arbitrators, especially in certain out state areas. But the Amendments are necessary to clarify the law and stem the tide of parties seeking removal of arbitrators in the district court. The Amendments also establish, for the first time, that a conflict exists if an arbitrator who is to rule on a disputed bill for a medical provider is aware that the provider has made referrals to the arbitrator within the last year.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
