In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Sharon Elizabeth Arbeiter, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 209648.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A09-663 In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Sharon Elizabeth Arbeiter, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 209648. ORDER The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Sharon Elizabeth Arbeiter committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, forging a signature on an authorization for release of medical records and obtaining records pursuant to the authorization, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(c) and (d). Respondent admits the allegations of the petition and waives her procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). Respondent and the Director jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a public reprimand. In cases of forgery, we typically impose some period of suspension from the practice of law. See, e.g., In re Yang, 755 N.W.2d 733, 734 (Minn. 2008) (imposing suspension for a minimum of six months for forging signature of a party to a marital termination agreement). In support of the recommended discipline, the Director notes that upon receiving records pursuant to the forged authorization, respondent promptly informed her supervisor of her conduct, which may not otherwise have been discovered. 1 In addition, respondent self-reported her misconduct to the Director. Finally, the Director notes that although admitted to practice law, respondent has never been engaged in the practice of law and the misconduct to which respondent admits occurred while respondent was working as a paralegal. The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition. Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Sharon Elizabeth Arbeiter is publicly reprimanded. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR. Dated: April 28, 2009 BY THE COURT: /s/ Alan C. Page Associate Justice 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
