Garrett M. Marshall, Employee, vs. Steinbrecher Painting, Inc., and Meadowbrook Claims Services, Relators, and Minnesota Department of Labor & Industry, Workers
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A08-1673 Garrett M. Marshall, Employee, vs. Steinbrecher Painting, Inc., and Meadowbrook Claims Services, Relators, and Minnesota Department of Labor & Industry, Workers Compensation Division, Respondent. ________________________________ T. Michael Kilbury, Peterson, Logren & Kilbury, P.A., St. Paul, Minnesota, for relators. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Rory H. Foley, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota, for respondent. ________________________________ Considered and decided by the court without oral argument. 1 ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 26, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case). Dated: January 28, 2009 BY THE COURT: /s/ Eric J. Magnuson Chief Justice 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
