Joshua Rechtfertig, Relator, vs. Michael Spiering, Uninsured, Respondent, and St. Mary

Annotate this Case
Joshua Rechtfertig, Relator, vs. Michael Spiering, Uninsured, Respondent, and St. Mary's Duluth Clinic Health System, and JC Christensen/Radiological Associates, Intervenors, and Special Compensation Fund, Respondent. A07-1306, Supreme Court Order, November 8, 2007.

STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN SUPREME COURT

A07-1306

 

 

Joshua Rechtfertig,

 

Relator,

 

vs.

 

Michael Spiering, Uninsured,

 

Respondent,

 

and

 

St. Mary's Duluth Clinic Health System,

and JC Christensen/Radiological Associates,

 

Intervenors,

 

and

 

Special Compensation Fund,

 

Respondent.

 

 

            Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

O R D E R

            Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

            IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed June 19, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion.  See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that "[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case). 

            Dated:  November 6, 2007

                                                                                    BY THE COURT:

 

 

 

    /s/                                                          

Russell A. Anderson

Chief Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.