Carrie L. Busch, Respondent, vs. Wal Mart, and Claims Mgmt., Inc., Relators, and Mayo Foundation, Mankato Clinic Ltd., Mankato Chiropractic Center, Mankato Anesthesia Associates, Ltd., Wal Mart Claims Administration, and Orthopaedic & Fracture Clinic, P.A., Intervenors.
Annotate this CaseSTATE OF MINNESOTA
IN SUPREME COURT
A06-161
Carrie L. Busch,
Respondent,
vs.
Wal Mart, and
Claims Mgmt., Inc.,
Relators,
and
Mayo Foundation,
Mankato Clinic Ltd.,
Mankato Chiropractic Center,
Mankato Anesthesia Associates, Ltd.,
Wal Mart Claims Administration, and
Orthopaedic & Fracture Clinic, P.A.,
Intervenors.
Considered and decided by the court en banc.
O R D E R
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed December 22, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.
Dated: April 28, 2006
BY THE COURT:
/s/
Helen M. Meyer
Associate Justice
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.