Louis Wheelock, Relator, vs. Trilite Stone, and USF&G, Respondents, and Trilite Stone, and MIGA/Fremont Comp. Group, Respondents, and Home Depot, and Am. Intn'l Group/AIG Claims Services, Respondents, and St. Francis Hospital, Blue Cross Blue Shield, and MN Dept. of Human Services, Intervenors.

Annotate this Case
Louis Wheelock, Relator, vs. Trilite Stone, and USF&G, Respondents, and Trilite Stone, and MIGA/Fremont Comp. Group, Respondents, and Home Depot, and Am. Intn'l Group/AIG Claims Services, Respondents, and St. Francis Hospital, Blue Cross Blue Shield, and MN Dept. of Human Services, Intervenors. A05-1697, Supreme Court, March 2, 2006.

STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN SUPREME COURT

A05-1697

 

Louis Wheelock,

 

            Relator,

 

vs.

 

Trilite Stone, and USF&G,

 

                                    Respondents,

 

and

 

Trilite Stone, and MIGA/Fremont

Comp. Group,

 

                                    Respondents,

 

and

 

Home Depot, and Am. Intn'l Group/AIG

Claims Services,

 

                                    Respondents,

 

and

 

St. Francis Hospital,

Blue Cross Blue Shield, and

MN Dept. of Human Services,

 

                                    Intervenors.

 

            Considered and decided by the court en banc.

O R D E R

            Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

            IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 1, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion.  See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

            Dated:  February 23, 2006

                                                                                    BY THE COURT:

 

 

 

    /s/                                                        

 

Helen M. Meyer

Associate Justice

 

            PAGE, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

 

 

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.