List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED June 26, 2002.

Annotate this Case
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED June 26, 2002 Minnesota Supreme Court
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED
June 26, 2002

1. Earl Lawrence Sanders v. State - C0-01-725 - Stay Vacated/PFR Denied/Remanded 2. State v. B.Y. C7-01-897 Granted 3. State v. Gary Lynn Underdahl C4-01-761 Denied 4. Ath Sam Khom v. Cypress Semiconductor and Commissioner of Economic Security C1-02-470 Denied 5. Lucinda Block v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Company C4-01-1974 - Denied 6. State v. Gregory Lee Backlund C3-01-1996 Denied 7. State v. Richard Allan Rymer C9-01-1033 Denied 8. In Re the Marriage of: James Richard Huntsman v. Zenith Annette Huntsman f/k/a Morgan C1-00-1923 Denied 9. Cargill, Incorporated v. Evanston Insurance Company C1-01-1589 Denied 10. State v. Michael Larivee C2-01-1942 Granted 11. State v. Amy Marie Herzog C3-01-802 Granted/Stayed 12. State v. Corey Lowell Zimmer C2-01-998 Denied 13. In the Matter of the Welfare of: I.B. C1-01-1835 Denied 14. In re: Rivka Freeman f/k/a Benavraham v. Mordechai Kobany C1-01-1317 - Denied 15. Mary Ellen Wagner, individually and as trustee for the next of kin of Helen Elizabeth Biegger, Deceased and Laurence C. Schonher, et al. v. Robert D. Lewis, Jr. C8-01-1265 and C9-01-1307 Denied 16. State, City of Afton v. Mark R. Atkins C3-01-1092 Denied 17. In the Matter of the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Permits in the City of Mounds View C0-01-1695 and C5-01-1708 Granted 18. Barbara Porch, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation and MIC Property & Casualty Insurance Corporation CX-01-1087 and C1-01-1415 Denied 19. State v. Marvin Jewell Dancy C2-01-1102 Denied 20. Michael Laray Winding v. State C6-01-1944 Denied 21. Gus A. Chafoulias v. Lori C. Peterson and American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. C2-01-1617 Granted

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.