ROGER E. CARUTHERS vs STATE OF FLORIDA
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ROGER E. CARUTHERS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D16-1567 [December 13, 2017] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Mindy F. Solomon, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13-6550 CF10A. Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. ON MOTION FOR REHEARING LEVINE, J. In a motion for rehearing, the state for the first time cites Dean v. State, 42 Fla. L. Weekly S769 (Fla. Aug. 31, 2017), an opinion which issued before oral argument in this case. In a concurring opinion in Dean, three justices stated that “where the evidence supports the charged offense as well as the requested instruction on a necessarily lesser included offense, any error in failing to give the requested instruction is harmless because the defendant is not entitled to an opportunity for a jury pardon.” See id. (Polston, J., concurring). Because Dean did not involve a majority, we are compelled to follow Daugherty v. State, 211 So. 3d 29 (Fla. 2017). See Santos v. State, 629 So. 2d 838, 840 (Fla. 1994) (“Under the Florida Constitution, both a binding decision and a binding precedential opinion are created to the extent that at least four members of the Court have joined in an opinion and decision.”) (citing art. V, §3(a), Fla. Const.) (footnotes omitted). Accordingly, the motion for rehearing is denied. GERBER, C.J., and MAY, J., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
