Mubarak Qureshi v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2014 MUBARAK QURESHI, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D13-1522 [November 19, 2014] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Robert Belanger, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562001CF002005A. Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Karen E. Ehrlich, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM. At the violation of probation hearing in this case, the trial judge found that appellant violated his probation by committing new substantive offenses. However, the written order of revocation of probation, which issued several days later, indicated that the basis for revocation was a failure to pay restitution, in addition to the commission of a new criminal offense. Appellant did not file a motion to correct a sentencing error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). See Jackson v. State, 983 So. 2d 562, 572 (Fla. 2008); Rivera v. State, 34 So. 3d 207, 208 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). By failing to file a Rule 3.800(b) motion, appellant waived this issue and cannot raise it on appeal. See Reese v. State, 763 So. 2d 537, 539 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Affirmed. GROSS, TAYLOR and GERBER, JJ., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
