Robinson v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2008 LELAND ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D08-788 [October 29, 2008] PER CURIAM. We affirm the summary denial of appellant s motion for postconviction relief. Most of the claims raised do not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel under the facts of this case. As to all the claims, appellant has failed to show Strickland prejudice in that he cannot show that the errors, if any, produced a result which was unreliable. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Appellant was charged with burglary, and the evidence showed that he was encountered inside a business by a police detective who positively identified him. He dropped a black bag which contained property of the business owner. All of the various claims do not change this essential testimony, and there is no probability that the matters raised in his motion make the result of his prior trial unreliable. STONE, WARNER and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur. * * * Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ana I. Gardiner, Judge; L.T. Case No. 04-16602 CF10A. Leland Robinson, Sanderson, pro se. No appearance required for appellee. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.