Demarco v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2008 LOUIS DEMARCO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D08-1647 [September 24, 2008] WARNER, J. The appellant challenges the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We issued an order to show cause to the state, to which it did not respond. We reverse in part the order summarily denying relief. We remand to allow the appellant to amend his motion to file a facially sufficient motion, as required by Spera v. State, 971 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 2007), as to his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to investigate and failure to call witnesses. As to his claim regarding his attorney s conflict of interest, we remand for an evidentiary hearing on that issue. See State v. Larzelere, 979 So. 2d 195, 208 (Fla. 2008); Burnside v. State, 656 So. 2d 241, 243-44 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) ( A situation in which the attorney s own interests diverge from those of the client presents the same core problem presented in the multiple representation cases: the attorney s fealty to the client is compromised. ) (quoting United States v. Fulton, 5 F.3d 605, 609 (2d Cir. 1993)). We also reverse on his claim of ineffective assistance in failing to preserve issues for appeal and remand for the court to attach portions of the record conclusively refuting this ground or for an evidentiary hearing. The record attached does not conclusively refute the allegations that failure to preserve various issues at trial constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. See Carratelli v. State, 961 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 2007); Diaz v. State, 980 So. 2d 1275, 1278 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (in determining whether counsel is ineffective for failing to preserve issues for appeal, the proper standard is to determine the effect of defense counsel s deficient performance on the original trial outcome, not on appeal). remaining allegations, we affirm. As to the STEVENSON and MAY, JJ., concur. * * * Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 02-11401 CF10A. David Oscar Markus of David Oscar Markus, PLLC, Miami, for appellant. No appearance required on behalf of appellee. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
