Tuhey v. State of Florida-issued-1-11-08
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2008 GLENN TUHEY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D06-4222 [January 11, 2008] CORRECTED OPINION FARMER, J. Tuhey entered a plea of no contest to battery on a detainee, trafficking in cocaine and violating probation. He was represented by counsel at the plea. But soon after entering his plea, he moved pro se to withdraw the plea, saying that it was by far not in his best interests. Critical to our purposes, he requested that counsel be appointed for the matter. The trial court found the motion facially insufficient because it lacked any factual allegations or reasons for withdrawing a plea. At the same time, the court denied an appointment of counsel. He appeals. We reverse. Rule 3.170(l) allows a defendant to withdraw a plea on specified grounds if motion is made, as here, within 30 days of entering the plea. Tuhey concedes that his motion is facially insufficient but argues that it was the very reason he sought the appointment of counsel to aid him in the effort so his motion would be sufficient. In Schriber v. State, 959 So.2d 1254 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), we said: the thirty-day window provided in Rule stage of the criminal proceedings and indeed if the defendant were not allowed counsel to assist in preparing the initial the plea. 3.170(l) is a critical it would be hollow the guiding hand of motion to withdraw 959 So.2d at 1257. Our opinion in Schriber did not restrict appointment of counsel only to situations where defendant alleges that a plea was instigated through misrepresentation, coercion or duress by defense counsel, as the State here argues. Nor did the court do so in Holifield v. State, 717 So.2d 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). It was error for the court to deny appointment of counsel to assist defendant in the critical stage of seeking to withdraw a plea timely under rule 3.170(l). On remand, the court can sort out whether defendant qualifies for representation by the Public Defender. Reversed. KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur. * * * Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Dwight L. Geiger, Retired Judge; L.T. Case No. 03-1406 CFA, 06-345 CFB and 06-861. Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ellen Griffin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Y. McIntire, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
