Felder v. Hull
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2007 JEFFREY FELDER, Petitioner, v. CONNIE HULL, Respondent. No. 4D06-3819 [March 21, 2007] KLEIN, J. Petitioner was the seller under a real estate contract on which the buyer made a $10,000 deposit. After the transaction failed to close a dispute arose as to who was entitled to the deposit. The county court judge found in favor of the seller without explanation, and the buyer obtained a reversal in circuit court, despite the absence of a transcript of the testimony of the trial in county court. In reversing and holding that the buyer was entitled to the return of her deposit, the circuit court ignored the contractual provision requiring the buyer to make a good faith effort to obtain the financing on which the contract was contingent. The circuit court accordingly failed to apply the correct law, which is that all provisions of a contract must be given effect. City of Homestead v. Johnson, 760 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 2000); Paladyne Corp. v. Weindruch, 867 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). If the circuit court had applied the correct law, the lack of transcript of the testimony as to the buyer s efforts to obtain financing would have required the circuit court to affirm the county court judgment in favor of the seller. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979). Our review of the decision of the circuit court sitting in its appellate capacity is limited to whether the circuit court afforded due process or applied the correct law, Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 419 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 1982). In this case the court failed to apply the correct law, and we accordingly grant the petition. STONE and HAZOURI, JJ., concur. * * * Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Leroy H. Moe, Judge; L.T. Case No. 0510802 CACE13. Victor D. Berg of Leon & Berg, P.A., and Deborah L. Appel, Tampa, for petitioner. Sonja K. Dickens of Arnstein & Lehr, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for respondent. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
