Pisani v. Duffin
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
July Term 2005
LOUIS A. PISANI,
Appellant,
v.
JAMES R. DUFFIN, JR., as Personal Representative of the Estates of
Amber Fae Duffin and Tyler James Richard Meyer,
Appellee.
Nos. 4D04-673 & 4D04-1198
[September 21, 2005]
ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
PER CURIAM.
Appellant has moved to clarify our reversal for a new trial to limit the
trial to liability, pointing out that none of the issues on which we
reversed involved damages.
Appellee plaintiff’s response has not
asserted that liability and damages are intertwined, and indeed they are
not, and we accordingly grant the motion for clarification and limit the
new trial to liability which will include apportionment of fault.
WARNER , K LEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
*
*
*
Consolidated appeals and cross-appeal from the Circuit Court for the
Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Leonard L. Stafford,
Judge; L.T. Case No. 02-19599 (05).
Elizabeth K. Russo of the Russo Appellate Law Firm, P.A., Miami, and
Green, Ackerman & Frost, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., and Philip M.
Burlington of Philip M. Burlington, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
`
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
