Williams v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2005 PHILLIP E. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D03-4716 [June 29, 2005] PER CURIAM. We affirm the order denying appellant s motion for postconviction relief based upon the ground that counsel was ineffective for failing to convey a plea offer. The trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing on the matter, based upon our direction in Williams v. State, 837 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). To establish that counsel was ineffective for failing to convey a plea offer, the defendant must show that: (1) counsel failed to communicate a plea offer or incorrectly advised defendant regarding the possible penalties; (2) the defendant would have accepted the plea offer but for the inadequate communication; and (3) acceptance of the plea offer would have resulted in a lesser sentence. Cottle v. State , 733 So. 2d 963, 967 (Fla. 1999). After hearing the evidence and making credibility determinations, the trial court found that defense counsel conveyed any plea offers, and appellant adamantly rejected such offers because he claimed he was not guilty. Affirmed. STONE, WARNER and HAZOURI , JJ., concur. * * * Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Kenneth D. Stern, Judge; L.T. Case No. 98-1616 CFA02. Ronald Chapman, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Laurel R. Wiley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.