Tammy Pedroza v. Michaels Stores Inc et al
Filing
9
ORDER OF REMAND: THE COURT having ordered the moving party to show cause in writing, not later than April 20, 2012, why this action should not be remanded and the moving party having failed to respond, THE COURT ORDERS that this action be, and hereby is, remanded for failure tocomply with the orders of the Courtby Judge Dean D. Pregerson. cc: order, docket, remand letteer toLos Angeles Superior Court, East District, Pomona, Case number No. KC 062855 Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (Attachments: # 1 remand letter) (lc)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
WESTERN DIVISION
411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053
Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516
(714) 338-4750
312 North Spring Street, Room G-8
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Tel: (213) 894-3535
EASTERN DIVISION
TERRY NAFISI
3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134
Riverside, CA 92501
(951) 328-4450
Date 5/9/12
District Court Executive and
Clerk of Court
LOS ANGELES SUPERIOUR COURT
EAST DISTRICT
400 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
POMONA, CA 91766
Re: Case Number: 2:12-cv-01102-DDP-VBK
Previously Superior Court Case No. KC062855
Case Name: Tammy Pedroza v. Michaels Stores Inc et al
Dear Sir / Madam:
Pursuant to this Court’s ORDER OF REMAND issued on 5/8/12
above-referenced case is hereby remanded to your jurisdiction.
, the
Attached is a certified copy of the ORDER OF REMAND and a copy of the docket sheet from this
Court.
Please acknowledge receipt of the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it
to our office. Thank you for your cooperation.
Respectfully,
Clerk, U. S. District Court
By: L Chai
Deputy Clerk
G Western
$
213-894-5730
G Eastern
G Southern Division
cc: Counsel of record
Receipt is acknowledged of the documents described herein.
Clerk, Superior Court
Date
CV - 103 (09/08)
By:
Deputy Clerk
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (CIVIL)
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
