Tammy Pedroza v. Michaels Stores Inc et al
Filing
9
ORDER OF REMAND: THE COURT having ordered the moving party to show cause in writing, not later than April 20, 2012, why this action should not be remanded and the moving party having failed to respond, THE COURT ORDERS that this action be, and hereby is, remanded for failure tocomply with the orders of the Courtby Judge Dean D. Pregerson. cc: order, docket, remand letteer toLos Angeles Superior Court, East District, Pomona, Case number No. KC 062855 Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (Attachments: # 1 remand letter) (lc)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
cc: order, docket, remand letter to
Los Angeles Superior Court, East District,
Pomona, No. KC 062855
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
TAMMY PEDROZA,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
v.
MICHAELS STORES, INC.,
Defendant.
15
16
17
____________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.
CV 12-01102 DDP (VBKx)
ORDER OF REMAND
18
19
THE COURT having ordered the moving party to show cause in writing, not later
20
than April 20, 2012, why this action should not be remanded and the moving party having
21
failed to respond,
22
23
24
THE COURT ORDERS that this action be, and hereby is, remanded for failure to
comply with the orders of the Court.
The Clerk shall mail, FAX or E:mail a copy of this Order to all counsel.
25
26
27
28
Dated: May 8, 2012
DEAN D. PREGERSON
United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
