USA v. Kanchanalak, et al, No. 99-3019 (D.C. Cir. 1999)

Annotate this Case

This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on October 8, 1999.

United States Court of Appeals for the district of columbia circuit No. 99-3019 September Term, 1999 No. 98cr00241

United States of America, Appellant v.

Pornpimol Kanchanalak a/k/a Pornpimol Parichattkal, and Duangnet Georgie Kronenberg, Appellees _________________________________

Consolidated with No. 99-3034 Before: WALD, SILBERMAN and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

It is ORDERED, by the Court, sua sponte, that the opinion filed on October 8, 1999, is amended as follows:

Page 2, 7 lines from bottom of page: "104.8(e)" should be "104.8 "

Page 3, 2nd full para., line 4: "defendants " should be "defendant "

Page 4, 1st full para., line 1: "July" should be "November"

Page 8, 2nd full para., line 6: " 441f" should be " 434(b)"

Page 13, 1st line: "appliable" should be "applicable"

Page 16, fn. 16, last line: "110.4a" should be "110.4(a)"

Page 19, fn. 18, line 12: add "convention" after "political"

Page 21, fn. 19 (cont.), line 13: " 441 " should be " 441e"

Page 23, fn. 21, line 6: "Fullbright" should be "Fulbright"

Page 24, fn. 23, line 1: "rule lenity" should be "rule of lenity"

FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk

Filed on November 3, 1999

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.