USA v. Microsoft Corp, No. 97-5343 (D.C. Cir. 1998)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on June 23, 1998.
United States Court of Appeals for the district of columbia circuit
No. 97-5343 September Term, 1997
United States of America, Appellee v.
Microsoft Corporation, Appellant
Consolidated with 98-5012
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 94cv01564) Before: Wald, Williams and Randolph, Circuit Judges.
O R D E R
It is ORDERED by the Court sua sponte that the opinion of June 23, 1998 be amended as follows: The following citations to "X Areeda, Antitrust Law" should be changed to "X Areeda, Elhauge & Hovenkamp, Antitrust Law." In the first citation, on page 23, the date (1996) remains as is. Page 23: line 21 and note 11, line 7.
Page 24: line 19.
Page 26: line 20.
Page 28: line 23.
On page 26, line 33, the date (1991) should be inserted into the citation, producing "IX Areeda, Antitrust Law 1700j at 15 (1991)." FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: Eva Brown Deputy Clerk
Filed on July 7, 1998
No. 97-5343 September Term, 1997
United States of America, Appellee v.
Microsoft Corporation, Appellant
Consolidated with 98-5012
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 94cv01564) Before: Wald, Williams and Randolph, Circuit Judges.
O R D E R
It is ORDERED by the Court sua sponte that the opinion of June 23, 1998 be amended as follows: The following citations to "X Areeda, Antitrust Law" should be changed to "X Areeda, Elhauge & Hovenkamp, Antitrust Law." In the first citation, on page 23, the date (1996) remains as is. Page 23: line 21 and note 11, line 7.
Page 24: line 19.
Page 26: line 20.
Page 28: line 23.
On page 26, line 33, the date (1991) should be inserted into the citation, producing "IX Areeda, Antitrust Law 1700j at 15 (1991)." FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: Eva Brown Deputy Clerk
Filed on July 7, 1998
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
