Amer Coaltn Compet v. Clinton, William J., et al, No. 97-1036 (D.C. Cir. 1997)

Annotate this Case
United States Court of Appeals

for the district of columbia circuit

No. 97-1036 September Term, 1997

American Coalition for Competitive Trade,

Petitioner



v.

William J. Clinton and United States of America,

Respondents

Government of Canada,

Intervenor

Before: Wald, Williams, and Rogers, Circuit Judges



Order

It is ordered, by the Court, that the opinion filed November 14, 1997, is amended as

follows:

Page 5: Delete the first sentence on the page, which reads: "Indeed, ACCT alleges only

one connection to any binational panel proceeding of any sort."

Page 5: Delete the phrase in the middle of the first paragraph on the page, which reads:

"which is a member organization in ACCT."

Page 5: Make two changes to the last sentence of the first paragraph on the page,

removing the word "other" and changing "concedes" to "states" in the sentence that reads:

"ACCT concedes that it has no evidence that any of its other members have ever participated in a

binational panel proceeding." This sentence should now read: "ACCT states that it has no

evidence that any of its members have ever participated in a binational panel proceeding."

Page 6: Delete the phrase in the first full paragraph on the page, which reads: "with the

exception of the Coalition for Fair Lumber Imports case, which was filed in this court several

years ago and cannot confer standing because it was settled."

Page 6 and 7: Delete the phrase on the last line of page 6 and the first line of page 7,

which reads: "with Coalition for Fair Lumber Imports excepted."

Page 7: Delete the phrase from the last line of the first full paragraph on the page, which

reads: "(with the exception of the Coalition for Fair Lumber Imports case discussed above)."

Page 8: Delete footnote 3.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

Filed: November 21, 1997

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.