Pacific Coast Supply, LLC v. NLRB, No. 14-1047 (D.C. Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CaseAnderson Lumber petitioned for review of the Board's determination that Anderson Lumber unlawfully withdrew recognition from a union. The court concluded that the district court did not unreasonably find that four of the eight employee statements upon which Anderson Lumber relied as its sole ground for withdrawal of recognition failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that those particular employees wanted to end union representation altogether rather than merely end their own membership in the union; the court rejected Anderson Lumber's claim that the Board wrongly barred it from bolstering its position with post-withdrawal evidence; and the court rejected Anderson Lumbers' remaining arguments, concluding that the Board was not unreasonable in finding that, in so doing, Anderson ran aground on the shoals of an unfair labor practice. Accordingly, the court denied Anderson Lumber's petition for review and granted the Board's cross-application for enforcement.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.