Paul Bame, et al v. Todd Dillard, et al, No. 09-5330 (D.C. Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on March 25, 2011.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 09-5330 September Term, 2010 FILED ON : MARCH 29, 2011 PAUL BAME , ET AL., APPELLEES v. TODD W. DILLARD , IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPICITY (FORMER UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ), APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:05-cv-01833) Before: GINSBURG and ROGERS, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge ORDER It is ORDERED, on the court s own motion, that the dissenting opinion issued on March 25, 2011, be amended as follows: On page 4, first full paragraph, delete lines 9-14 beginning with the citation Pearson v. Callahan and ending at 823. , and insert in lieu thereof: Pearson v. Callahan, 129 S. Ct. 808 (2009). There the Supreme Court concluded that the narcotics task force officers were entitled to rely on the consensus among the courts to the consent-once-removed doctrine at the time of their warrantless entry into a home, despite the lack of a ruling from the officers own federal circuit, id. at 823. Per Curiam FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: /s/ Jennifer M. Clark Deputy Clerk
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
