United States v. Jackson, No. 17-3350 (7th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseJackson was convicted, based on a scheme to defraud mortgage lenders, of wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. 1343, and mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. 1341, and was sentenced to 112 months’ imprisonment on each of three counts, to be served concurrently, plus concurrent three‐year terms of supervised release, a $300 special assessment, and restitution of $8,515,570. The Seventh Circuit vacated the sentence, finding that the court erroneously applied the obstruction‐of‐justice enhancement. At resentencing, the court removed that enhancement and imposed a sentence of 100 months’ imprisonment. It did not change the remaining elements of the sentence. Jackson appealed the terms of her supervised release. The parties agreed that certain conditions were impermissibly vague in light of recent Seventh Circuit decisions. At her third sentencing, Jackson received a sentence of 76 months’ imprisonment, with the same special assessment and restitution, and terms of supervised release that complied with precedent. The district court orally announced the conditions of supervised release and explained why each condition was imposed but did not orally announce any condition requiring that Jackson notify a probation officer within 72 hours of being arrested or questioned by a law enforcement officer. The district court’s written judgment included that discretionary condition. The Seventh Circuit vacated the sentence with a corrective instruction. When “an inconsistency exists between an oral and the later written sentence, the sentence pronounced from the bench controls.”
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.