USA v. Adam Hill, No. 15-3090 (7th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on April 7, 2016.
Download PDF
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Submitted March 10, 2016 Decided May 20, 2016 Before DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge No. 15-3090 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ADAM BRENT HILL, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. No. 14-CR-30207-NJR-1 Nancy J. Rosenstengel, Judge. ORDER The defendant pleaded guilty to receiving child pornography, see 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2)(B), and was sentenced to 10 years in prison plus a fine and restitution and 5 years of supervised release. He filed a notice of appeal, but his lawyer asserts that the appeal is frivolous and seeks to withdraw. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). We remanded the case to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether the defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived any challenge to the conditions of his supervised release. See United States v. Hill, No. 15-3090, 2016 WL 1381248 (7th Cir. 2016). Counsel informs us that the district court subsequently held a hearing and found the waiver to be knowing and voluntary. Finding no other potentially No. 15-3090 Page 2 meritorious issues, we conclude that the appeal is frivolous. Thus, we GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and DISMISS the appeal.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
