United States v. Bloch, No. 15-1648 (7th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseResponding to a 2011 call reporting “shots fired,” officers found Bloch, a convicted felon, intoxicated, and discovered a loaded Glock semi-automatic handgun, an assault rifle, and ammunition. He was convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon, 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) and unlawful possession of a firearm after conviction for a domestic-violence misdemeanor, 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(9). The court imposed a sentence of 138 months’ imprisonment. The Seventh Circuit held Bloch’s two 922(g) convictions had to be merged. On remand, the district court sentenced Bloch to 120 months’ imprisonment. On second remand, for resentencing, the district court filed in the electronic “Notice of Proposed Conditions of Supervision” to give advance notice of proposed supervised release conditions, providing an explanation for why it was imposing each condition. Bloch acknowledged he had reviewed that notice and objected only to a home-visit condition. The court reworded the condition. With a guideline range of 84-105 months, the court considered the factors listed in 18 U.S.C. 3553(a) and pronounced a sentence of 105 months’ imprisonment. The Seventh Circuit affirmed. The district court not only adequately explained its justification for imposing supervised release, it adopted a “best practice” for providing adequate notice to defendants of proposed conditions of supervised release and their justifications.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.