Paysun Long v. Kim Butler, No. 13-3327 (7th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on October 27, 2015.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 April 20, 2016 No. 13-3327 PAYSUN LONG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. KIM BUTLER, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois. No. 1:11-cv-1265-MMM Michael M. Mihm, District Judge. ORDER The petition for rehearing en banc is granted. The panel’s opinion and judgment are vacated. The court directs the parties to file supplemental briefs addressing the effect of 28 U.S.C. §2254(d)(1), the subject of Part III of the petition for rehearing en banc. The court solicits the parties’ views on the question whether at the time the conviction became final it was “clearly established” that the principle of Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 (1959), and its successors, applied under the circumstances of this litigation. When addressing that question, the parties should consider the appropriate level of generality at which to understand what rules Napue and its successors stand for. See, e.g., Woods v. Donald, 135 S. Ct. 1372 (2015); Lopez v. Smith, 135 S. Ct. 1 (2014); Nevada v. Jackson, 133 S. Ct. 1990 (2013). Appellant's opening brief is due on May 18, 2016, appellee’s response on June 8, 2016, and any reply brief on June 22, 2016. The principal briefs must not exceed 7,000 words, and the reply (if any) 3,500 words. By separate order the court will set a date for oral argument.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
