Brandon Stollings v. Ryobi Technologies, Inc., No. 12-2984 (7th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on August 2, 2013.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 August 13, 2013 Before DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge JOHN D. TINDER, Circuit Judge DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge No. 12-2984 BRANDON STOLLINGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. v. No. 08 C 4006 RYOBI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants-Appellees. Gary S. Feinerman, Judge. ORDER The opinion issued on August 2, 2013 is hereby AMENDED as follows: On page 19, the fifth sentence in the full paragraph before heading B is amended as follows: The court then concluded that Graham s testimony had to be excluded under Federal Rule of Evidence Civil Procedure 702 because the fact that the 90 percent effectiveness input was not reliable rendered Graham s entire opinion unreliable. As amended the sentence now reads: The court then concluded that Graham s testimony had to be excluded under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 because the fact that the 90 percent effectiveness input was not reliable rendered Graham s entire opinion unreliable. On page 27, the second sentence in the paragraph starting after heading III is amended by deleting the period at the end of the phrase correctly states the law and a comma is inserted in its place, just before the citation to Lewis v. City of Chicago Police Dep t.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
