Ka5e54 Television Partnership, Appellant, v. Federal Communications Commission, Appellee, 84 F.3d 1452 (D.C. Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 84 F.3d 1452 (D.C. Cir. 1996) April 29, 1996

Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge; GINSBURG and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This case was heard on the record from the Federal Communications Commission and on the briefs and arguments of counsel. The court has accorded the arguments full consideration and has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 36(b). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the decision of the Commission be affirmed. The Commission rejected the appellant's application on the ground that, inter alia, the appellant had not shown a lack of harmful interference with respect to 316 proposed stations within 50 miles. Insofar as the appellant failed to raise its specific objections to the Commission's conclusion in a second petition for reconsideration, the objections are not properly before the court.

The clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 41(a) (1).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.