Barry Skidelsky, Appellant, v. Federal Communications Commission,bradmark Broadcasting Company, Intervenor, 8 F.3d 71 (D.C. Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 8 F.3d 71 (D.C. Cir. 1994) Oct. 28, 1993. Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En BancDenied Jan. 10, 1994

Before: EDWARDS, SILBERMAN and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This appeal was considered on the record from the Federal Communications Commission and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 14(c). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Federal Communications Commission order, In re Barry Skidelsky, MM Docket No. 90-181 (FCC 92-398, Released September 2, 1992), be affirmed. The Commission's decision is supported by substantial evidence in the record. See Millar v. FCC, 707 F.2d 1530, 1539 (D.C. Cir. 1983).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.