Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Correctional Officer Andrews; Correctional Officer Boyette;correctional Officer Milligan; Nurse Rand; Nurse O'neal;psychologist Cheran; Lieutenant Walker; Mr. Mcmichaels;ms. Moody; Kelly George, Defendants-appellees, 73 F.3d 358 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseCornelius Tucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Dennis Worley, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying several of Tucker's myriad pre-trial motions. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
