Eduardo Perez Hernandez, Petitioner-appellant, v. John Hahn, Warden, Respondent-appellee, 73 F.3d 357 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseEduardo Perez Hernandez, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Stephan Altimari, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.
Before HALL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hernandez v. Hahn, No. CA-95-160 (E.D. Va. June 28, 1995). We therefore grant Appellant's motion to amend his informal brief and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
