Illes P. Csorba, Plaintiff--appellant, v. Itt Electro-optical Products Division, Defendant--appellee, 73 F.3d 356 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 73 F.3d 356 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted Dec. 14, 1995Decided Dec. 26, 1995

Illes P. Csorba, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Douglas Henson, II, THE CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT LAW, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's orders that dismissed his claim that he was denied employment because of his national origin and granted summary judgment to the defendant as to his claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Csorba v. ITT-EOPD, No. CA-94-593-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 24, 1994 and Feb. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.