Kevin Battle; Joseph Hankins; Winston Lloyd; Gordonyautis, Plaintiffs-appellants,andkevin Johnson; David Campbell; Randall Simmons; Danieldavis; Russell Adams; Jesse Seymour, Plaintiffs, v. Richard Lanham, Commissioner of Corrections; Earl Beshears,warden, Eastern Correctional Institution; Georgekalaroumakis, Eastern Correctional Institution Annex;captain Worthy, Eastern Correctional Institution Annex;lieutenant Flaig; Lieutenant Henderson; Chief of Security,eastern Correctional Institution Maximum, Defendants-appellees, 73 F.3d 356 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 73 F.3d 356 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted: December 12, 1995. Decided: December 21, 1995

Kevin Battle, Joseph Hankins, Winston Lloyd, Gordon Yautis, Appellants Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Audrey J.S. Carrion, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Lanham, No. CA-94-258-B (D. Md. July 26, 1995). Additionally, we deny Appellant Winston Lloyd's motion to consolidate all the Appellants' notices of appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.