Irisdeane H. Charles, Appellant, v. National Rehabilitation Hospital; Sharon Bottcher, 72 F.3d 919 (D.C. Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 72 F.3d 919 (D.C. Cir. 1995) Nov. 29, 1995

Before: BUCKLEY, GINSBURG, and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the order of the district court granting summary judgment and dismissing appellant's claims for constructive discharge and intentional infliction of emotional distress be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum opinion filed September 29, 1994. The working conditions alleged by appellant do not amount to constructive discharge or intentional infliction of emotional distress. See Katradis v. Dave-El of Washington, D.C., 846 F.2d 1482, 1485 (D.C. Cir. 1988); Clark v. Marsh, 665 F.2d 1168, 1173 (D.C. Cir. 1981); Waldon v. Covington, 415 A.2d 1070, 1076 (D.C.1980).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.