Gloria A. Ford, Appellant, v. Communications Satellite Corporation, Appellee, 72 F.3d 919 (D.C. Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 72 F.3d 919 (D.C. Cir. 1995) Nov. 22, 1995

Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge; GINSBURG and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.


JUDGMENT

This case was heard on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments by counsel. The court has accorded the arguments full consideration and has determined the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 36(b).

It is ORDERED that the judgment from which this appeal has been taken be affirmed. The appellant failed to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination because she did not show she was qualified for the position she sought. See Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 253 (1981); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802 (1973). The undisputed evidence established that the appellant lacked a college degree, the minimum educational requirement for the new position, while the successful applicant possessed one. Further, the appellant did not show that the degree requirement was pretextual. See Burdine, 450 U.S. at 253; McDonnell Douglas, 411 U.S. at 804.

The clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 41(a) (1).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.