Clyde S. Lockhart, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security,defendant-appellee, 72 F.3d 127 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseClyde S. Lockhart, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order* affirming the Secretary's final decision denying his claim for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Lockhart v. Chater, No. CA-93-329 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 11, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1988)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
