Douglass W. Krehnbrink, a Minor by His Parents and Nextfriends, William H. Krehnbrink and Debra A.krehnbrink, Plaintiff--appellant, v. Maryland State Department of Education; Baltimore Countypublic Schools, Defendants--appellees, 72 F.3d 127 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 72 F.3d 127 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted Oct. 31, 1995. Decided Dec. 20, 1995

Douglass W. Krehnbrink, Appellant Pro Se.

Jo Ann Grozuczak Goedert, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Leslie Robert Stellman, BLUM, YUMKAS, MAILMAN, GUTMAN & DENICK, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before HALL, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to the defendants and denying his cross-motion for summary judgment in his action pursuant to the civil remedies provisions of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C.A. Sec. 1415(e) (West 1990 & Supp.1995). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Krehnbrink v. Maryland State Dep't of Educ., No. CA-93-1423-WN (D. Md. July 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.