Stacy Orlando Parham, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Willie Challis; Frank Bega, Defendants-appellees, 72 F.3d 127 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseStacy Orlando Parham, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh McCoy Fain, III, SPOTTS, SMITH, FAIN & RAWLS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The parties consented to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Parham v. Challis, No. CA-94-371 (E.D. Va. Apr. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
