Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.mildred Miller, Plaintiff--appellant, v. Kathleen Hawk, Director of Bureau of Prisons; United Statesparole Commission; Maureen Atwood, Warden; John L.megatlin, Administrative Head of Bureau of Prisons Regionaloffice; James Hamrick; Don Edwards; John Does, I Throughv; Jane Does, I Through V, Defendants--appellees, 64 F.3d 658 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 64 F.3d 658 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted: July 27, 1995. Decided: August 15, 1995

Mildred Miller, appellant pro se. Rebecca A. Betts, U.S. Atty., Donald Lee Stennett, Office of the U.S. Atty., Charleston, WV, for appellees.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants on Appellant's Privacy Act claim, denying Appellant's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1988) petition, and denying Appellant's motion to reconsider the dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Miller v. Hawk, No. CA-93-785-1 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 4, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.