Eustace C. Mullins, Appellant, v. Anti-defamation League of B'nai B'rith, 62 F.3d 424 (D.C. Cir. 1995)

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed May 24, 1994, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated therein. The district court properly held that most of Mullins' claims were time-barred and that the remainder failed to state a claim. Furthermore, any error in denying the motion for leave to amend as moot was harmless, because the amended complaint does not state any timely claim.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 41.